Paper · 2011 · Plant Soil and Environment

Effects of row spacing on soil water and water consumption of winter wheat under irrigated and rainfed conditions

X.B. Zhou; Y.H. Chen; Z. Ouyang

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The results of two seasons' work on soil water content (SWC), evapotranspiration (ET), total dry matter (TDM), and harvest index (HI) of crops under different row spacing (RS), as well as possible ways to improve water utilization, have been reported. Field experiments were carried out at the Experimental Farm of Shandong Agricultural University (36°09'N, 117°09'E) in 2006-2007 and 2007-2008. Four types of RS were treated under two different water conditions (rainfed and irrigated) and set up in a randomized plot design. RS did not exhibit any obvious effects on SWC during the study period. SWC was enhanced evidently by irrigation, especially in the 10-60 cm soil layer. Irrigation increased the ET of crop. At the seeding-jointing stage, the ET of RS14 was significantly higher than those during other treatments (P < 0.05). Irrigation increased yields, ET, and TDM, while it decreased water use efficiency and HI. There were significantly negative correlations between TDM and RS (P < 0.05). The HI of the rainfed crop was higher than that of the irrigated crop. Results showed that high yields of wheat could be achieved in northern China by reducing RS under uniform planting density conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing had no obvious effect on soil water content.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RSe0
Outcome
SWCe0
Direction
did not exhibit any obvious effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RS did not exhibit any obvious effects on SWC during the study period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased soil water content, especially at 10-60 cm.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
SWCe0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
10-60 cm soil layere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SWC was enhanced evidently by irrigation, especially in the 10-60 cm soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased crop evapotranspiration.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
ETe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased the ET of crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At seeding to jointing, RS14 had higher ET than other row spacings.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
seeding-jointing stagee0
Treatment
RS14e0
Outcome
ETe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the seeding-jointing stage, the ET of RS14 was significantly higher than those during other treatments (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–832 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased yields, ET, and TDM, while it decreased water use efficiency and HI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation increased total dry matter.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
TDMe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased yields, ET, and TDM, while it decreased water use efficiency and HI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation decreased water use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased yields, ET, and TDM, while it decreased water use efficiency and HI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation decreased harvest index.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Irrigatione0
Outcome
HIe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation increased yields, ET, and TDM, while it decreased water use efficiency and HI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 834–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter declined with wider row spacing.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
RSe0
Outcome
TDMe0
Direction
negative correlationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were significantly negative correlations between TDM and RS (P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–74 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that narrower rows can give high wheat yields in northern China.

Treatment
reducing RSe0
Outcome
high yieldse0
Setting
northern Chinae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high yields of wheat could be achieved in northern China by reducing RS under uniform planting density conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1206 · show in text ↑

density · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 2 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

irrigation · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 25 positive, 14 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.