Paper · 2016 · PLoS ONE

Responses of Winter Wheat Yield and Water Use Efficiency to Irrigation Frequency and Planting Pattern

Chengyue Bian; Changjian Ma; Xinhui Liu; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
59
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A suitable planting pattern and irrigation strategy are essential for optimizing winter wheat yield and water use efficiency (WUE). The study aimed to evaluate the impact of planting pattern and irrigation frequency on grain yield and WUE of winter wheat. During the 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 winter wheat growing seasons in the North China Plain, the effects of planting patterns and irrigation frequencies were determined on tiller number, grain yield, and WUE. The two planting patterns tested were wide-precision and conventional-cultivation. Each planting pattern had three irrigation regimes: irrigation (120 mm) at the jointing stage; irrigation (60 mm) at both the jointing and heading stages; and irrigation (40 mm) at the jointing, heading, and milking stages. In our study, tiller number was significantly higher in the wide-precision planting pattern than in the conventional-cultivation planting pattern. Additionally, the highest grain yields and WUE were observed when irrigation was applied at the jointing stage (120 mm) or at the jointing and heading stages (60 mm each) in the wide-precision planting pattern. These results could be attributed to higher tiller numbers as well as reduced water consumption due to reduced irrigation frequency. In both growing seasons, applying 60 mm of water at jointing and heading stages resulted in the highest grain yield among the treatments. Based on our results, for winter wheat production in semi-humid regions, we recommend a wide-precision planting pattern with irrigation (60 mm) at both the jointing and heading stages.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide-precision planting significantly increased winter wheat tiller number compared with conventional cultivation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
wide-precision planting patterne0
Outcome
tiller numbere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
conventional-cultivation planting patterne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tiller number was significantly higher in the wide-precision planting pattern than in the conventional-cultivation planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–914 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield and WUE of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide-precision planting with 120 mm irrigation at jointing gave one of the highest winter wheat grain yields.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
irrigation was applied at the jointing stage (120 mm)e0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
wide-precision planting patterne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain yields and WUE were observed when irrigation was applied at the jointing stage (120 mm) or at the jointing and heading stages (60 mm each) in the wide-precision planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield and WUE of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide-precision planting with 120 mm irrigation at jointing gave one of the highest winter wheat WUE values.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
irrigation was applied at the jointing stage (120 mm)e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
wide-precision planting patterne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain yields and WUE were observed when irrigation was applied at the jointing stage (120 mm) or at the jointing and heading stages (60 mm each) in the wide-precision planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield and WUE of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide-precision planting with 60 mm irrigation at both jointing and heading gave the highest winter wheat grain yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
applying 60 mm of water at jointing and heading stagese2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Qualifier
In both growing seasonse2
Comparator
the treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain yields and WUE were observed when irrigation was applied at the jointing stage (120 mm) or at the jointing and heading stages (60 mm each) in the wide-precision planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield and WUE of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–254 · show in text ↑
e2

“In both growing seasons, applying 60 mm of water at jointing and heading stages resulted in the highest grain yield among the treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wide-precision planting with 60 mm irrigation at both jointing and heading gave one of the highest winter wheat WUE values.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
at the jointing and heading stages (60 mm each)e0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
wide-precision planting patterne0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain yields and WUE were observed when irrigation was applied at the jointing stage (120 mm) or at the jointing and heading stages (60 mm each) in the wide-precision planting pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1125 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield and WUE of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–254 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed the yield and WUE response partly to higher tiller numbers.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
higher tiller numberse0
Qualifier
could be attributede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results could be attributed to higher tiller numbers as well as reduced water consumption due to reduced irrigation frequency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1259 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield and WUE of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–254 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed the response partly to reduced water consumption from less frequent irrigation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Outcome
reduced water consumptione0
Qualifier
due to reduced irrigation frequencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results could be attributed to higher tiller numbers as well as reduced water consumption due to reduced irrigation frequency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1259 · show in text ↑
e1

“grain yield and WUE of winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–254 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend wide-precision planting with 60 mm irrigation at jointing and heading for winter wheat in semi-humid regions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
a wide-precision planting pattern with irrigation (60 mm) at both the jointing and heading stagese0
Setting
semi-humid regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for winter wheat production in semi-humid regions, we recommend a wide-precision planting pattern with irrigation (60 mm) at both the jointing and heading stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1581 · show in text ↑

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.