Paper · 2018 · Land Degradation and Development

Mortierella elongata's roles in organic agriculture and crop growth promotion in a mineral soil

Fang Li; Lin Chen; Marc Redmile‐Gordon; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
215
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The addition of organic amendments contributes substantially to improvements in soil quality and prevents soil degradation. However, very little is known about the responses of dominant fungal strains to organic fertilizers or their functions in the nutrient transformations and crop growth promotion. Here, soils and maize roots were collected from a 35‐year field experiment treated with composted soybean cake. The fungal communities in the bulk soil, rhizosphere, and endosphere were analyzed by deep amplicon sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer region gene. Overall, the soil fungal community was dominated by the phyla Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota. Organic amendments changed the fungal community composition, with significant increase in the relative abundances of Mortierella , Fusarium , and Chaetomiceae in the bulk and rhizosphere soils. Mortierella elongata was the most successful fungi responding to organic inputs as seen by the surge in abundance. Genome characteristics of M. elongata indicated that M. elongata possessed the functional capacity to degrade a range of toxic organics, and thereby improve soil health. Furthermore, M. elongata 's capacity to compose recalcitrant substances that can contribute to pools of long‐term stable SOM was confirmed. These findings suggest that M. elongata may be mechanistic in sequestering C in soil. Inoculations of M. elongata into soil significantly increased the levels of plant indole acetic acid and plant biomass. Soil phosphatase and β‐glucosidase activities were also improved. Our study suggests that M. elongata can defend against soil degradation, improve soil health, and stimulate production of plant growth hormones.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic amendments increased Mortierella, Fusarium and Chaetomiceae abundance in bulk and rhizosphere soils.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Organic amendmentse0
Outcome
relative abundances of Mortierella , Fusarium , and Chaetomiceaee0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic amendments changed the fungal community composition, with significant increase in the relative abundances of Mortierella , Fusarium , and Chaetomiceae in the bulk and rhizosphere soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–338 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mortierella elongata had the strongest abundance response to organic inputs.

Taxon
Mortierella elongataLinnemannia elongatae0
Treatment
organic inputse0
Outcome
abundancee0
Direction
surgee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linnemannia elongata
Linnemannia elongata · Taxonzygolife · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mortierella elongata was the most successful fungi responding to organic inputs as seen by the surge in abundance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 881–995 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The M. elongata genome indicated capacity to degrade toxic organics.

Taxon
M. elongataLinnemannia elongatae0
Outcome
functional capacity to degrade a range of toxic organicse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linnemannia elongata
Linnemannia elongata · Taxonzygolife · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Genome characteristics of M. elongata indicated that M. elongata possessed the functional capacity to degrade a range of toxic organics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1131 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. elongata was confirmed to compose recalcitrant substances contributing to stable soil organic matter.

Taxon
M. elongataLinnemannia elongatae0
Outcome
capacity to compose recalcitrant substancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Linnemannia elongata
Linnemannia elongata · Taxonzygolife · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“M. elongata 's capacity to compose recalcitrant substances that can contribute to pools of long‐term stable SOM was confirmed.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1305 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M. elongata inoculation significantly increased plant indole acetic acid.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Inoculations of M. elongata into soile0
Interactor
M. elongataLinnemannia elongatae0symbiont
Outcome
levels of plant indole acetic acide0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Linnemannia elongata
Linnemannia elongata · Interactorzygolife · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations of M. elongata into soil significantly increased the levels of plant indole acetic acid and plant biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1511 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M. elongata inoculation significantly increased plant biomass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Inoculations of M. elongata into soile0
Interactor
M. elongataLinnemannia elongatae0symbiont
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Linnemannia elongata
Linnemannia elongata · Interactorzygolife · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculations of M. elongata into soil significantly increased the levels of plant indole acetic acid and plant biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1511 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–338 · show in text ↑

Linnemannia elongata · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

129 papers: 117 positive, 12 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

125 papers more in this group

See all 129 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.