Abstract
The effect of sugar beet seed (primed and non-primed) on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet was examined. The experiment was realized in the years 2012-2014 at an Experiment Field Station of Warsaw University of Life Sciences -SGGW Faculty of Agriculture and Biology in Skierniewice (5197'N, 2019'E) in Poland. The experimental factor was diversified seed material of the same cultivar of sugar beet -typical seeds, traditionally prepared for sowing (non-primed seeds) and seeds before sowing, subjected to the process of priming. On average for the three years of the study, no significant effect of seed priming on the field emergence was found. On the other hand, the sugar beet emergence on plots with primed seeds was faster, more even and uniform. Seed priming, on average for the three years of the study, significantly increased the mean root mass during harvest. In contrast, priming the seeds did not cause an increase in the final plant density. No significant effect of seed priming on root yield was found, both on average for the studied period and in particular years of the study.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Seed priming had no significant effect on sugar beet field emergence, on average over three years.
- Taxon
- sugar beet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Treatment
- seed priminge3
- Outcome
- field emergencee3
- Direction
- no significant effecte3
- Qualifier
- On average for the three years of the studye3
- Comparator
- non-primed seedse2
- Setting
- Skierniewicee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of sugar beet seed (primed and non-primed) on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet was examined”
e1“at an Experiment Field Station of Warsaw University of Life Sciences -SGGW Faculty of Agriculture and Biology in Skierniewice”
e2“typical seeds, traditionally prepared for sowing (non-primed seeds)”
e3“On average for the three years of the study, no significant effect of seed priming on the field emergence was found”
Claim · model-written summary
Sugar beet emergence on plots with primed seeds was faster, more even and uniform than with non-primed seeds.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- primed seedse4
- Outcome
- emergencee4
- Direction
- faster, more even and uniforme4
- Comparator
- non-primed seedse2
- Setting
- Skierniewicee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of sugar beet seed (primed and non-primed) on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet was examined”
e1“at an Experiment Field Station of Warsaw University of Life Sciences -SGGW Faculty of Agriculture and Biology in Skierniewice”
e2“typical seeds, traditionally prepared for sowing (non-primed seeds)”
e4“the sugar beet emergence on plots with primed seeds was faster, more even and uniform”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed priming significantly increased the mean root mass of sugar beet at harvest, on average over three years.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Seed priminge5
- Outcome
- mean root mass during harveste5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Qualifier
- On average for the three years of the studye5
- Comparator
- non-primed seedse2
- Setting
- Skierniewicee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of sugar beet seed (primed and non-primed) on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet was examined”
e1“at an Experiment Field Station of Warsaw University of Life Sciences -SGGW Faculty of Agriculture and Biology in Skierniewice”
e2“typical seeds, traditionally prepared for sowing (non-primed seeds)”
e5“Seed priming, on average for the three years of the study, significantly increased the mean root mass during harvest”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed priming did not increase the final plant density of sugar beet.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- priming the seedse6
- Outcome
- final plant densitye6
- Direction
- did not cause an increasee6
- Comparator
- non-primed seedse2
- Setting
- Skierniewicee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of sugar beet seed (primed and non-primed) on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet was examined”
e1“at an Experiment Field Station of Warsaw University of Life Sciences -SGGW Faculty of Agriculture and Biology in Skierniewice”
e2“typical seeds, traditionally prepared for sowing (non-primed seeds)”
e6“priming the seeds did not cause an increase in the final plant density”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed priming had no significant effect on sugar beet root yield.
- Taxon
- sugar beetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- seed priminge7
- Outcome
- root yielde7
- Direction
- No significant effecte7
- Comparator
- non-primed seedse2
- Setting
- Skierniewicee1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect of sugar beet seed (primed and non-primed) on field emergence and root yield of sugar beet was examined”
e1“at an Experiment Field Station of Warsaw University of Life Sciences -SGGW Faculty of Agriculture and Biology in Skierniewice”
e2“typical seeds, traditionally prepared for sowing (non-primed seeds)”
e7“No significant effect of seed priming on root yield was found”
The same questions in other papers
seed treatment · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →seed treatment · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
30 papers more in this group
See all 34 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.