Paper · 1990 · Seed Science and Technology

Sugar-beet seed treatments and early sowing.

M. J. Durrant; S. J. Mash

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

(...) Eight experiments between 1987 and 1988 showed that with early March sowings, therecently introduced 12 hour thiram-steep seed treatment gave an average of 15% more plants than the previous EMP-steep treatment. Therefore, in future, more growers may be tempted to sow before 20 March, the earliest date recommended at present. However, the thiram-steeped seed gave more bolters: the increase was equivalent to plants responding to about three additional cool days (air max <12 C) after sowing. In some years, sowing thiram-steeped seed even as early as 20 March could give enough bolters which, if not controlled, would cause weed beet infestations (...)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With early March sowing, 12 hour thiram steeping gave 15% more plants than EMP steeping.

Treatment
12 hour thiram-steep seed treatmente0
Outcome
plantse0
Direction
moree0
Value
15%e0
Qualifier
early March sowingse0
Comparator
previous EMP-steep treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e0

“with early March sowings, therecently introduced 12 hour thiram-steep seed treatment gave an average of 15% more plants than the previous EMP-steep treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 58–216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiram steeping increased bolters by an amount equivalent to roughly three additional cool days.

Treatment
thiram-steeped seede0
Outcome
bolterse0
Direction
moree0
Value
about three additional cool dayse0
Comparator
previous EMP-steep treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e0

“the thiram-steeped seed gave more bolters: the increase was equivalent to plants responding to about three additional cool days (air max <12 C) after sowing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–499 · show in text ↑
e1

“previous EMP-steep treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–215 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors warn that thiram steeping at 20 March can cause weed beet infestation if bolters are uncontrolled.

Outcome
weed beet infestationse0
Qualifier
if not controllede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugar-beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–10 · show in text ↑
e0

“sowing thiram-steeped seed even as early as 20 March could give enough bolters which, if not controlled, would cause weed beet infestations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–654 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.