Paper · 1989 · Weed Technology

Perennial Vine Control in Multiple Cropping Systems on a Clay Soil

C. Dennis Elmore; Larry G. Heatherly; Richard A. Wesley

7
claims
18
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An area of a shrink-swell clay soil (Tunica clay, Vertic Haplaquept) with an established population of redvine, trumpetcreeper, honeyvine milkweed, redberry moonseed, and maypop passionflower was treated with dicamba once in the fall of 1983. The effect on perennial vines was determined for the following 4 yr in three rotational cropping systems involving winter wheat, soybean, corn, and sorghum, all with and without irrigation. Dicamba reduced the population of perennial vines 80% over 4 yr. Redvine and trumpetcreeper, the first and second most abundant species, were reduced by over 83 and 76%, respectively. Yield of soybean increased 17% in 1985 and 1987 while corn yield increased 9% in 1986 with dicamba use. In 1984 no effects on crop yield were measured. This inconsistent crop yield reponse after dicamba treatment, even though perennial vines were suppressed, must be considered in evaluating the economics of using dicamba for perennial vine control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba reduced perennial vine populations by 80% over four years.

Taxon
perennial vinese0
Treatment
Dicambae0
Outcome
population of perennial vinese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Dicamba reduced the population of perennial vines 80% over 4 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial Vine Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba reduced redvine by over 83%.

Taxon
Redvinee0
Treatment
dicambae1
Outcome
Redvinee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
over 83e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Redvine and trumpetcreeper, the first and second most abundant species, were reduced by over 83 and 76%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial Vine Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dicamba reduced the population of perennial vines 80% over 4 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba reduced trumpetcreeper by 76%.

Taxon
trumpetcreeperCampsis radicanse0
Treatment
dicambae1
Outcome
trumpetcreepere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Campsis radicans
Campsis radicans · TaxonMiwasatoshi · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Redvine and trumpetcreeper, the first and second most abundant species, were reduced by over 83 and 76%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial Vine Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dicamba reduced the population of perennial vines 80% over 4 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba increased soybean yield by 17% in 1985 and 1987.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
dicambae0
Outcome
Yield of soybeane0
Direction
increasede0
Value
17%e0
Qualifier
in 1985 and 1987e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of soybean increased 17% in 1985 and 1987 while corn yield increased 9% in 1986 with dicamba use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Multiple Cropping Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba increased corn yield by 9% in 1986.

Treatment
dicambae0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
9%e0
Qualifier
in 1986e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield of soybean increased 17% in 1985 and 1987 while corn yield increased 9% in 1986 with dicamba use.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 617–720 · show in text ↑
t0

“Multiple Cropping Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No crop yield effect was measured in 1984.

Taxon
winter wheat, soybean, corn, and sorghumGlycine maxSorghumTriticum aestivumZea mays subsp. mayse1
Treatment
dicambae2
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
no effectse0
Qualifier
In 1984e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1984 no effects on crop yield were measured.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–768 · show in text ↑
t0

“Multiple Cropping Systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–51 · show in text ↑
e1

“three rotational cropping systems involving winter wheat, soybean, corn, and sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–398 · show in text ↑
e2

“Dicamba reduced the population of perennial vines 80% over 4 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–497 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors advise considering inconsistent crop yield response when evaluating dicamba economics.

Taxon
perennial vinese0
Outcome
evaluating the economics of using dicamba for perennial vine controle0

Verbatim

e0

“This inconsistent crop yield reponse after dicamba treatment, even though perennial vines were suppressed, must be considered in evaluating the economics of using dicamba for perennial vine control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–967 · show in text ↑
t0

“Perennial Vine Control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–22 · show in text ↑

dicamba · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

49 papers: 11 positive, 38 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

dicamba · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

dicamba · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 7 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

dicamba · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.