Paper · 2022 · Agronomy

Effect of Rice-Straw Biochar Application on the Acquisition of Rhizosphere Phosphorus in Acidified Paddy Soil

Yikai Zhang; Yikai Zhang; Huizhe Chen; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A serious acidification trend currently affects paddy soil and soil phosphorus (P) availability has declined in rice production. This study investigated the effect of rice-straw biochar on P availability and the adaptability of rice roots in acidified soil. Rice was grown in rhizoboxes, allowing for the precise sampling of rhizosphere and bulk soil for the sequential extraction of P fractions. Biochar may provide a liming effect and strong nutrient adsorption, leading to soil improvement. The results confirmed that biochar application significantly improved plant growth and P accumulation in shoots by 29% and 75%, respectively. However, the application of washed biochar and equivalent lime only increased shoot biomass and P accumulation by 13.4% and 11.2%, and by 42% and 38%, respectively. Compared with the control, applying biochar increased the plant-available P component contents in rhizosphere and bulk soil. Biochar affected the chemical balance among the different P fractions, increased aluminum-bound phosphate (Al-P) pool, calcium-bound phosphate (Ca-P) pool and decreased the occluded phosphate pool in acidic paddy soil. Biochar amendment significantly improved root growth of and increased the citrate exudation from roots under low P supply, accompanied by the enhanced expression of the anion-transporter-related OsFRDL4 gene and the OsPT1 phosphate transporter. The results showed that biochar application in degraded acidic soils could improve rice potential for P acquisition to increase available P component and maintain high citrate exudation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased rice plant growth by 29%.

Treatment
biochar applicatione0
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Value
29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar application significantly improved plant growth and P accumulation in shoots by 29% and 75%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–634 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased shoot P accumulation by 75%.

Treatment
biochar applicatione0
Outcome
P accumulation in shootse0
Direction
improvede0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar application significantly improved plant growth and P accumulation in shoots by 29% and 75%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–634 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Washed biochar increased shoot biomass by 13.4%.

Treatment
washed biochare0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of washed biochar and equivalent lime only increased shoot biomass and P accumulation by 13.4% and 11.2%, and by 42% and 38%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice-Straw”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–20 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Washed biochar increased shoot P accumulation by 11.2%.

Treatment
washed biochare0
Outcome
P accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of washed biochar and equivalent lime only increased shoot biomass and P accumulation by 13.4% and 11.2%, and by 42% and 38%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Equivalent lime increased shoot biomass by 42%.

Treatment
equivalent limee0
Outcome
shoot biomasse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
42%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of washed biochar and equivalent lime only increased shoot biomass and P accumulation by 13.4% and 11.2%, and by 42% and 38%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Equivalent lime increased shoot P accumulation by 38%.

Treatment
equivalent limee0
Outcome
P accumulatione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of washed biochar and equivalent lime only increased shoot biomass and P accumulation by 13.4% and 11.2%, and by 42% and 38%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased plant-available P components in rhizosphere and bulk soil relative to control.

Treatment
applying biochare0
Outcome
plant-available P component contents in rhizosphere and bulk soile0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control, applying biochar increased the plant-available P component contents in rhizosphere and bulk soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–925 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased the aluminum-bound phosphate pool.

Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
aluminum-bound phosphate (Al-P) poole0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar affected the chemical balance among the different P fractions, increased aluminum-bound phosphate (Al-P) pool, calcium-bound phosphate (Ca-P) pool and decreased the occluded phosphate pool in acidic paddy soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased the calcium-bound phosphate pool.

Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
calcium-bound phosphate (Ca-P) poole0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar affected the chemical balance among the different P fractions, increased aluminum-bound phosphate (Al-P) pool, calcium-bound phosphate (Ca-P) pool and decreased the occluded phosphate pool in acidic paddy soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar decreased the occluded phosphate pool.

Treatment
Biochare0
Outcome
occluded phosphate poole0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar affected the chemical balance among the different P fractions, increased aluminum-bound phosphate (Al-P) pool, calcium-bound phosphate (Ca-P) pool and decreased the occluded phosphate pool in acidic paddy soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1144 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar significantly improved root growth under low P supply.

Treatment
Biochar amendmente0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
under low P supplye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar amendment significantly improved root growth of and increased the citrate exudation from roots under low P supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased citrate exudation from roots under low P supply.

Treatment
Biochar amendmente0
Outcome
citrate exudation from rootse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under low P supplye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Biochar amendment significantly improved root growth of and increased the citrate exudation from roots under low P supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar enhanced expression of OsFRDL4 and OsPT1.

Treatment
Biochar amendmente1
Gene
OsFRDL4 gene and the OsPT1 phosphate transportere0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced expression of the anion-transporter-related OsFRDL4 gene and the OsPT1 phosphate transporter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1388 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biochar amendment significantly improved root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1197 · show in text ↑
e2

“Rice was grown in rhizoboxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–286 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude biochar could improve rice P acquisition in degraded acidic soil.

Treatment
biochar applicatione0
Outcome
rice potential for P acquisitione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biochar application in degraded acidic soils could improve rice potential for P acquisition to increase available P component and maintain high citrate exudation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1575 · show in text ↑

lime · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 25 positive, 3 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 28 positive, 4 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

biochar · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

55 papers: 52 positive, 3 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

51 papers more in this group

See all 55 papers →

biochar · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 64 positive, 6 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

other · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 72 positive, 9 negative or no effect

71 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 81 positive, 5 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

other · molecular: expression · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.