Paper · 2017 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

The effects of humic acid on growth and ion uptake of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) grown under salt stress

Kalyoncu Ozlem; Akinci Sener; Bozkurt Esin

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
16
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the effects of humic acid (HA) on seedlings of a salt-sensitive plant, mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek), grown on 50 mM (S1) and 100 mM (S2) NaCl concentrations. In controlled room conditions, mung bean seedlings were planted in pots containing torf and perlite mixture and salt effects were observed. The growth parameters were plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, leaf and stem fresh and dry weights in which all parameters significantly decreased at both salt levels. Nutrient analyses of Na, K and Ca were conducted by flame photometry (FP), and Mg, Mn, Zn were tested by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES), for the above and below ground parts of mung bean seedlings. Both salt treatments increased Na content significantly, however 10 ml addition of HA to those samples (S1HA and S2HA; 50 mM NaCl and 100 mM NaCl, respectively) caused reductions in Na contents of the above-ground parts of mung bean compared to plants watered with only Hoagland-Arnon solutions (HO). On the other hand, in the roots of mung bean seedlings, Na content rose significantly in S2 compared with control, but the amount of Na in S2HA significantly increased compared with S2 treated plants. K content was significantly decreased in both salt concentrations, while SHA1 and SHA2 caused slight increases in both above and underground parts of seedlings. In the experiment, SHA2 increased the content of K, Mg, Ca, Mn and Zn in the root of mung bean seedlings compared with both S1 and S2 treatments. Key words: NaCl, mung bean, growth, nutrient Vigna radiata, humic acid.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both salt levels significantly decreased seedling growth measures.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
both salt levelse0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, leaf and stem fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth parameters were plant height, number of leaves, leaf area, leaf and stem fresh and dry weights in which all parameters significantly decreased at both salt levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both salt treatments significantly increased sodium content.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Both salt treatmentse0
Outcome
Na contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both salt treatments increased Na content significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid reduced above-ground sodium content under salt treatment relative to Hoagland-Arnon-only plants.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
10 ml addition of HAe0
Outcome
Na contents of the above-ground partse0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
plants watered with only Hoagland-Arnon solutions (HO)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 ml addition of HA to those samples (S1HA and S2HA; 50 mM NaCl and 100 mM NaCl, respectively) caused reductions in Na contents of the above-ground parts of mung bean compared to plants watered with only Hoagland-Arnon solutions (HO).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1045 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 mM NaCl significantly increased root sodium versus control.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
S2e0
Outcome
Na contente0
Direction
rosee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the roots of mung bean seedlings, Na content rose significantly in S2 compared with control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1159 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid with S2 significantly increased root sodium versus S2 alone.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
S2HAe0
Outcome
amount of Nae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
S2 treated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the amount of Na in S2HA significantly increased compared with S2 treated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1246 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both salt concentrations significantly decreased potassium content.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
both salt concentrationse0
Outcome
K contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“K content was significantly decreased in both salt concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHA1 and SHA2 slightly increased potassium in above- and below-ground seedling parts.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
SHA1 and SHA2e0
Outcome
slight increases in both above and underground parts of seedlingse0
Direction
increasese0
Qualifier
K contente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SHA1 and SHA2 caused slight increases in both above and underground parts of seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“mung bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–63 · show in text ↑
e1

“K content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1256 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHA2 increased root K, Mg and Ca relative to S1 and S2.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
SHA2e0
Outcome
content of K, Mg, Cae0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
both S1 and S2 treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SHA2 increased the content of K, Mg, Ca, Mn and Zn in the root of mung bean seedlings compared with both S1 and S2 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1553 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SHA2 increased root Mn and Zn relative to S1 and S2.

Taxon
mung beanVigna radiatae0
Treatment
SHA2e0
Outcome
Mn and Zne0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
both S1 and S2 treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SHA2 increased the content of K, Mg, Ca, Mn and Zn in the root of mung bean seedlings compared with both S1 and S2 treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1553 · show in text ↑

salinity · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 4 positive, 42 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.