Paper · 2017 · Bangladesh Agronomy Journal

Productivity of Summer Onion to Different Sources and Levels of Potash

MS Naher; S Brahma; MA Islam; et al.

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the research field of the Spices Research Centre, Shibganj, Bogra, Bangladesh in the summer season of 2013-2014 to find out the response of summer onion (var. BARI Peaj-3) to different levels and sources of potassium application. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. Potassium fertilizer combinations were comprised of four levels (0, 60, 120 and 180kg ha -1) and two potassium sources viz. Potassium Chloride (KCl) and Potassium Sulphate (K2SO4). A significant improvement in different growth and yield parameters of onion was observed in response to different sources and levels of potassium. The results indicated that the maximum plant height, leaves plant-1, length of leaf, length of bulb, diameter of bulb, average bulb weight, number of bulb per m2 and yield of bulbs were obtained from the onion crop which was treated with 120 kg K ha-1 from the Sulphate of Potash (SOP) fertilizer. Among the treatments the highest bulb yield (14.33 t ha-1) was obtained with 120 kg K ha-1 and the lowest (6.92t ha-1) from the control. The highest disease incidents (65.67%) were recorded from the control followed by the plots which were treated with 60 kg K ha-1 (62.28%). The lowest disease incidence (49.22%) was recorded from 180 kgha-1 SOP treated plot. Application of 120 kg K ha-1 from K2SO4 along with a blanket dose of N100P50S20B1.5Zn4 kgha-1 and 5 ton cowdung ha-1 appeared to be the optimum dose for maximizing the bulb yield of summer onion.Bangladesh Agron. J. 2017, 20(1): 37-43

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium source and dose significantly improved onion growth and yield parameters.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
different sources and levels of potassiume0
Outcome
growth and yield parameterse0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant improvement in different growth and yield parameters of onion was observed in response to different sources and levels of potassium.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion given 120 kg K ha-1 from sulphate of potash had maximum plant height, leaf number and leaf length.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
120 kg K ha-1 from the Sulphate of Potash (SOP) fertilizere0
Outcome
plant height, leaves plant-1, length of leafe0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum plant height, leaves plant-1, length of leaf, length of bulb, diameter of bulb, average bulb weight, number of bulb per m2 and yield of bulbs were obtained from the onion crop which was treated with 120 kg K ha-1 from the Sulphate of Potash (SOP) fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion given 120 kg K ha-1 from sulphate of potash had maximum bulb length, diameter and average weight.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
120 kg K ha-1 from the Sulphate of Potash (SOP) fertilizere0
Outcome
length of bulb, diameter of bulb, average bulb weighte0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum plant height, leaves plant-1, length of leaf, length of bulb, diameter of bulb, average bulb weight, number of bulb per m2 and yield of bulbs were obtained from the onion crop which was treated with 120 kg K ha-1 from the Sulphate of Potash (SOP) fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Onion given 120 kg K ha-1 from sulphate of potash had maximum bulb count and yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
120 kg K ha-1 from the Sulphate of Potash (SOP) fertilizere0
Outcome
number of bulb per m2 and yield of bulbse0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum plant height, leaves plant-1, length of leaf, length of bulb, diameter of bulb, average bulb weight, number of bulb per m2 and yield of bulbs were obtained from the onion crop which was treated with 120 kg K ha-1 from the Sulphate of Potash (SOP) fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–982 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest onion bulb yield was 14.33 t ha-1 at 120 kg K ha-1, compared with 6.92t ha-1 in the control.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
120 kg K ha-1e0
Outcome
bulb yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.33 t ha-1e0
Qualifier
6.92t ha-1e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treatments the highest bulb yield (14.33 t ha-1) was obtained with 120 kg K ha-1 and the lowest (6.92t ha-1) from the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1119 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and yield parameters of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–613 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control plots had the highest onion disease incidence, 65.67%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
disease incidentse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
65.67%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest disease incidents (65.67%) were recorded from the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1189 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and yield parameters of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plots given 60 kg K ha-1 had 62.28% onion disease incidence.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae2
Treatment
60 kg K ha-1e0
Outcome
disease incidentse1
Direction
followed bye1
Value
62.28%e0
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plots which were treated with 60 kg K ha-1 (62.28%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“The highest disease incidents (65.67%) were recorded from the control followed by the plots which were treated with 60 kg K ha-1 (62.28%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1258 · show in text ↑
e2

“growth and yield parameters of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest onion disease incidence, 49.22%, occurred at 180 kgha-1 SOP.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
180 kgha-1 SOPe0
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
49.22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest disease incidence (49.22%) was recorded from 180 kgha-1 SOP treated plot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1343 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth and yield parameters of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–613 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 120 kg K ha-1 from K2SO4 with the stated blanket fertilizer and cowdung dose to maximize summer onion bulb yield.

Taxon
summer onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
120 kg K ha-1 from K2SO4 along with a blanket dose of N100P50S20B1.5Zn4 kgha-1 and 5 ton cowdung ha-1e0
Outcome
maximizing the bulb yielde0
Qualifier
appeared to be the optimum dosee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 120 kg K ha-1 from K2SO4 along with a blanket dose of N100P50S20B1.5Zn4 kgha-1 and 5 ton cowdung ha-1 appeared to be the optimum dose for maximizing the bulb yield of summer onion.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1539 · show in text ↑

sulfate · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfate · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfate · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

potassium · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

potassium · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 54 positive, 5 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

294 papers: 251 positive, 43 negative or no effect

250 papers in the same direction as this paper · 40 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

290 papers more in this group

See all 294 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

potassium · disease · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.