Paper · 2015 · BIOINFOLET - A Quarterly Journal of Life Sciences

Response of different sources of Nitrogen and Potassium on Kharif onion (Allium cepa L.) var. Arka Kalyan

Liga Kale; T. B. Allolli; R. Hegde

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The authors studied the effect of nitrogen and potassium sources on kharif onion (Allium cepa L.) var. Arka Kalyan. The superiority of morphological characters like plant height, number of leaves, neck thickness, leaf area, chlorophyll content, dry matter and nutrient uptake were due to sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate. Among various interaction effects, the highest uptake of nitrogen and potassium were due to interaction of sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate. Similarly polar diameter, equatorial diameter, fresh bulb weight, rings per bulb, bulb yield were significantly maximum due to application of sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate than other sources of potassium and nitrogen.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate gave superior plant height, number of leaves and neck thickness in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphatee1
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves, neck thicknesse1
Direction
superioritye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“The superiority of morphological characters like plant height, number of leaves, neck thickness, leaf area, chlorophyll content, dry matter and nutrient uptake were due to sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate gave superior leaf area, chlorophyll content and dry matter in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphatee1
Outcome
leaf area, chlorophyll content, dry mattere1
Direction
superioritye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“The superiority of morphological characters like plant height, number of leaves, neck thickness, leaf area, chlorophyll content, dry matter and nutrient uptake were due to sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate gave superior nutrient uptake in onion.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphatee1
Outcome
nutrient uptakee1
Direction
superioritye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“The superiority of morphological characters like plant height, number of leaves, neck thickness, leaf area, chlorophyll content, dry matter and nutrient uptake were due to sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate gave the highest nitrogen and potassium uptake.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
interaction of sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphatee2
Outcome
uptake of nitrogen and potassiume2
Direction
higheste2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“the highest uptake of nitrogen and potassium were due to interaction of sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate gave significantly maximum polar and equatorial bulb diameters.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
application of sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphatee3
Outcome
polar diameter, equatorial diametere3
Direction
maximume3
Comparator
other sources of potassium and nitrogene3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“polar diameter, equatorial diameter, fresh bulb weight, rings per bulb, bulb yield were significantly maximum due to application of sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate than other sources of potassium and nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–706 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate gave significantly maximum fresh bulb weight, rings per bulb and bulb yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
application of sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphatee3
Outcome
fresh bulb weight, rings per bulb, bulb yielde3
Direction
maximume3
Comparator
other sources of potassium and nitrogene3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“kharif onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 68–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“polar diameter, equatorial diameter, fresh bulb weight, rings per bulb, bulb yield were significantly maximum due to application of sulphate of potash and ammonium sulphate than other sources of potassium and nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–706 · show in text ↑

sulfate · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sulfate · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sulfate · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

ammonium sulfate · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ammonium sulfate · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

ammonium sulfate · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

potassium · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

potassium · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 54 positive, 5 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.