Paper · 1997 · Biotechnology Progress

Altering Flavor Profiles in Onion (Allium cepa L.) Root Cultures Through Directed Biosynthesis

C. L. Prince; M. L. Shuler; Y. Yamada

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
23
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Root cultures of Allium cepa L. (onion) were fed potential precursors in the sulfate reduction pathway to the (+) ‐ S ‐alk(en) yl‐ l ‐cysteine sulfoxides (RCSOs) which are flavor precursors in Allium sp. Sulfate, valine, and methacrylic acid did not increase RCSO production, indicating that these steps were not rate limiting. Cysteine, glutathione, and methionine could increase both the methyl‐ and propenylcysteine sulfoxides. The ratio of the propenyl to methyl form could be dramatically altered (over a range of 8.5) depending on the amount and type of precursor used. Additionally, novel flavor components, not normally found in A. cepa L., were made in substantial amounts by feeding the corresponding thiol (propyl, 2‐propenyl (allyl), and ethyl) . These results demonstrate that customized flavor profiles can be produced from Allium root cultures and provide an example of the use of plant cell cultures to produce novel metabolites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfate did not increase RCSO production.

Treatment
Sulfatee0
Outcome
RCSO productione0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfate, valine, and methacrylic acid did not increase RCSO production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Valine did not increase RCSO production.

Treatment
valinee0
Outcome
RCSO productione0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfate, valine, and methacrylic acid did not increase RCSO production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methacrylic acid did not increase RCSO production.

Treatment
methacrylic acide0
Outcome
RCSO productione0
Direction
did not increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sulfate, valine, and methacrylic acid did not increase RCSO production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cysteine could increase both methyl- and propenylcysteine sulfoxides.

Treatment
Cysteinee0
Outcome
methyl‐ and propenylcysteine sulfoxidese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cysteine, glutathione, and methionine could increase both the methyl‐ and propenylcysteine sulfoxides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glutathione could increase both sulfoxides.

Treatment
glutathionee0
Outcome
methyl‐ and propenylcysteine sulfoxidese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cysteine, glutathione, and methionine could increase both the methyl‐ and propenylcysteine sulfoxides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methionine could increase both sulfoxides.

Treatment
methioninee0
Outcome
methyl‐ and propenylcysteine sulfoxidese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Cysteine, glutathione, and methionine could increase both the methyl‐ and propenylcysteine sulfoxides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–439 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Precursor amount and type altered the propenyl-to-methyl ratio over a range of 8.5.

Treatment
amount and type of precursor usede0
Outcome
ratio of the propenyl to methyl forme0
Value
8.5e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The ratio of the propenyl to methyl form could be dramatically altered (over a range of 8.5) depending on the amount and type of precursor used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propyl thiol feeding produced a novel flavor component.

Taxon
A. cepa L.Allium cepae0
Treatment
propyle0
Outcome
novel flavor componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“novel flavor components, not normally found in A. cepa L., were made in substantial amounts by feeding the corresponding thiol (propyl, 2‐propenyl (allyl), and ethyl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Allyl thiol feeding produced a novel flavor component.

Taxon
A. cepa L.Allium cepae0
Treatment
2‐propenyl (allyl)e0
Outcome
novel flavor componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“novel flavor components, not normally found in A. cepa L., were made in substantial amounts by feeding the corresponding thiol (propyl, 2‐propenyl (allyl), and ethyl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethyl thiol feeding produced a novel flavor component.

Taxon
A. cepa L.Allium cepae0
Treatment
ethyle0
Outcome
novel flavor componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“novel flavor components, not normally found in A. cepa L., were made in substantial amounts by feeding the corresponding thiol (propyl, 2‐propenyl (allyl), and ethyl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–765 · show in text ↑

sulfate · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

methionine · molecular: metabolites · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.