Abstract
Results showed that there was negligible lowing of the strength of alpha-amylase activity throughout the experiment of fumigation, as recorded by chimotachigraph, amylograph and albeograph. There was no degradation in the amount of glutein or in the beta-amylase activity. By the above treatment, there was a slight degradation in the special flavour and taste of the baked products, but it was concluded that there was not too much disadvantage practically.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Fumigation negligibly lowered alpha-amylase activity.
- Taxon
- WHEAT
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- fumigatione0
- Gene
- alpha-amylasee0
- Outcome
- alpha-amylase activitye0
- Direction
- negligible lowinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“negligible lowing of the strength of alpha-amylase activity throughout the experiment of fumigation”
t0“WHEAT FLOUR”
Claim · model-written summary
Fumigation did not degrade gluten amount.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- fumigatione1
- Outcome
- amount of gluteine0
- Direction
- no degradatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no degradation in the amount of glutein or in the beta-amylase activity”
e1“experiment of fumigation”
t0“WHEAT FLOUR”
Claim · model-written summary
Fumigation did not degrade beta-amylase activity.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- fumigatione1
- Gene
- beta-amylasee0
- Outcome
- beta-amylase activitye0
- Direction
- no degradatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“There was no degradation in the amount of glutein or in the beta-amylase activity”
e1“experiment of fumigation”
t0“WHEAT FLOUR”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment slightly degraded baked product flavor and taste.
- Taxon
- WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- fumigatione1
- Outcome
- special flavour and taste of the baked productse0
- Direction
- slight degradatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there was a slight degradation in the special flavour and taste of the baked products”
e1“experiment of fumigation”
t0“WHEAT FLOUR”
The same questions in other papers
solarization · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.