Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Interactive Effect of Elevated (CO2) on Biomass and Carbohydrate Partitioning under Phosphorus Stress

Milan Kumar Lal; Renu Pandey

17
claims
35
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

We investigated the interaction of elevated (CO2) on partitioning of carbohydrate from shoot to root under phosphorus (P) stress. Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396) to study the interactive effects of P (5 µM and 500 µM) and (CO2) (400 and 700 µL L-1) was taken. In P-starved plants higher growth was observed at elevated (CO2). Under nutrient deficiency and/or elevated (CO2) higher root-to-shoot ratio was observed and increasing nutrient uptake by providing more root surface. P levels or (CO2) did not cause significant changes to the leaf soluble sugar content, whereas starch concentration increased at low P, irrespective of the CO2 treatment. The chla and total chlorophyll varied significantly only due to nutrient treatment while chlb was also influenced by (CO2). The root protein averaged over nutrient treatment increased by 16% in PDW-233 whereas it reduced by 30% in PBW-396 as compared to ambient (CO2).PDW-233 recorded higher shoot and root protein averaged over (CO2) and nutrient treatments. The root dry weight was almost doubled in both varieties at e(CO2) while the total biomass accumulation increased by 54 to 70%. PBW-396 responded to e(CO2) in terms of biomass accumulation under low P compared to PDW-233the sugar concentration was more than doubled in PBW-396 as compared to PDW-233. The increase in reducing, non-reducing and total sugars at low P was 40, 122 and 93%, respectively as compared to control. This experiment shows that extra CO2 help to ameliorate the effect of P deficiency. The severe effects of P deficiency on growth and development of wheat plant was mitigated to some extent by elevated (CO2).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In P-starved wheat plants, growth was higher at elevated CO2.

Treatment
elevated (CO2)e1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
In P-starved plantse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“In P-starved plants higher growth was observed at elevated (CO2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–394 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under nutrient deficiency and/or elevated CO2, root-to-shoot ratio was higher in wheat.

Treatment
nutrient deficiency and/or elevated (CO2)e2
Outcome
root-to-shoot ratioe2
Direction
highere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e2

“Under nutrient deficiency and/or elevated (CO2) higher root-to-shoot ratio was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus levels or CO2 did not significantly change leaf soluble sugar content of wheat.

Treatment
P levels or (CO2)e3
Outcome
leaf soluble sugar contente3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e3

“P levels or (CO2) did not cause significant changes to the leaf soluble sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Starch concentration in wheat increased at low P, irrespective of CO2 treatment.

Treatment
low Pe4
Outcome
starch concentratione4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e4

“whereas starch concentration increased at low P, irrespective of the CO2 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll of wheat varied significantly only with nutrient treatment.

Treatment
nutrient treatmente5
Outcome
chla and total chlorophylle5
Direction
variede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e5

“The chla and total chlorophyll varied significantly only due to nutrient treatment while chlb was also influenced by (CO2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–840 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll b of wheat was influenced by CO2.

Treatment
(CO2)e5
Outcome
chlbe5
Direction
influencede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e5

“The chla and total chlorophyll varied significantly only due to nutrient treatment while chlb was also influenced by (CO2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–840 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root protein of PDW-233 increased by 16% at elevated CO2 compared with ambient CO2.

Material
PDW-233e6
Outcome
root proteine6
Direction
increasede6
Value
16%e6
Comparator
ambient (CO2)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e6

“The root protein averaged over nutrient treatment increased by 16% in PDW-233 whereas it reduced by 30% in PBW-396 as compared to ambient (CO2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–985 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root protein of PBW-396 decreased by 30% compared with ambient CO2.

Material
PBW-396e6
Outcome
root proteine6
Direction
reducede6
Value
30%e6
Comparator
ambient (CO2)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e6

“The root protein averaged over nutrient treatment increased by 16% in PDW-233 whereas it reduced by 30% in PBW-396 as compared to ambient (CO2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–985 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PDW-233 recorded higher shoot and root protein averaged over CO2 and nutrient treatments.

Material
PDW-233e7
Outcome
shoot and root proteine7
Direction
highere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e7

“PDW-233 recorded higher shoot and root protein averaged over (CO2) and nutrient treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1076 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight of wheat almost doubled in both varieties at elevated CO2.

Treatment
e(CO2)e1
Outcome
root dry weighte1
Direction
almost doublede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“The root dry weight was almost doubled in both varieties at e(CO2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1144 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total biomass accumulation of wheat increased by 54 to 70% at elevated CO2.

Treatment
e(CO2)e1
Outcome
total biomass accumulatione2
Direction
increasede2
Value
54 to 70%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“The root dry weight was almost doubled in both varieties at e(CO2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1144 · show in text ↑
e2

“while the total biomass accumulation increased by 54 to 70%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1204 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PBW-396 responded to elevated CO2 in biomass accumulation under low P compared with PDW-233.

Material
PBW-396e1
Treatment
e(CO2)e1
Outcome
biomass accumulatione1
Direction
respondede1
Comparator
PDW-233e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“PBW-396 responded to e(CO2) in terms of biomass accumulation under low P compared to PDW-233”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1298 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar concentration of PBW-396 was more than doubled compared with PDW-233.

Material
PBW-396e1
Outcome
sugar concentratione1
Direction
more than doublede1
Comparator
PDW-233e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“the sugar concentration was more than doubled in PBW-396 as compared to PDW-233”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1377 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing sugars increased by 40% at low P compared with control.

Treatment
low Pe1
Outcome
reducinge1
Direction
increasee1
Value
40e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in reducing, non-reducing and total sugars at low P was 40, 122 and 93%, respectively as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-reducing sugars increased by 122% at low P compared with control.

Treatment
low Pe1
Outcome
non-reducinge1
Direction
increasee1
Value
122e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in reducing, non-reducing and total sugars at low P was 40, 122 and 93%, respectively as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total sugars increased by 93% at low P compared with control.

Treatment
low Pe1
Outcome
total sugarse1
Direction
increasee1
Value
93%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“The increase in reducing, non-reducing and total sugars at low P was 40, 122 and 93%, respectively as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1500 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extra CO2 helps to ameliorate the effect of P deficiency on wheat (author interpretation).

Treatment
extra CO2e1
Outcome
effect of P deficiencye1
Direction
amelioratee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiment was conducted on wheat varieties (Triticum durum (PDW-233) and Triticum aestivum (PBW-396)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 130–231 · show in text ↑
e1

“extra CO2 help to ameliorate the effect of P deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1529–1584 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

phosphorus · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.