Paper · 2017 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Variations in yield and gluten proteins in durum wheat varieties under late‐season foliar versus soil application of nitrogen fertilizer in a northern Mediterranean environment

Giovanna Visioli; Urbana Bonas; Cristian Dal Cortivo; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
47
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND With the increasing demand for high‐quality foodstuffs and concern for environmental sustainability, late‐season nitrogen (N) foliar fertilization of common wheat is now an important and widespread practice. This study investigated the effects of late‐season foliar versus soil N fertilization on yield and protein content of four varieties of durum wheat, Aureo, Ariosto, Biensur and Liberdur, in a three‐year field trial in northern Italy. RESULTS Variations in low‐molecular‐weight glutenins (LMW‐GS), high‐molecular‐weight glutenins (HMW‐GS) and gliadins were assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE). It was found that N applied to the canopy did not improve protein rate compared with N application to the soil (general mean 138 mg g −1 ), but moderately increased productivity in the high‐yielding varieties Liberdur and Biensur (three‐year means 7.23 vs 7.13 and 7.53 vs 7.09 t ha −1 respectively). Technological quality was mainly related to variety choice, Aureo and Ariosto having higher protein rates and glutenin/gliadin ratios. Also found was a strong ‘variety × N application method’ interaction in the proportions of protein subunits within each class, particularly LMW‐GS and gliadins. A promising result was the higher N uptake efficiency, although as apparent balance, combined with higher HMW/LMW‐GS ratio in var. Biensur. CONCLUSION Late‐season foliar N fertilization allows N fertilizer saving, potentially providing environmental benefits in the rainy climate of the northern Mediterranean area, and also leads to variety‐dependent up‐regulation of essential LMW‐GS and gliadins. Variety choice is a key factor in obtaining high technological quality, although it is currently associated with modest grain yield. This study provides evidence of high quality in the specific high‐yielding variety Biensur, suggesting its potential as a mono‐varietal semolina for pasta production. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen did not improve protein rate relative to soil application.

Treatment
N applied to the canopye0
Outcome
protein ratee0
Direction
did not improvee0
Value
138 mg g −1e0
Comparator
N application to the soile0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“N applied to the canopy did not improve protein rate compared with N application to the soil (general mean 138 mg g −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–804 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen moderately increased productivity in Liberdur.

Material
Liberdure0
Treatment
foliart0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.23 vs 7.13e0
Comparator
soilt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat varieties under late‐season foliar versus soil application of nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“moderately increased productivity in the high‐yielding varieties Liberdur and Biensur (three‐year means 7.23 vs 7.13 and 7.53 vs 7.09 t ha −1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–965 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen moderately increased productivity in Biensur.

Material
Biensure0
Treatment
foliart0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.53 vs 7.09 t ha −1e0
Comparator
soilt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat varieties under late‐season foliar versus soil application of nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“moderately increased productivity in the high‐yielding varieties Liberdur and Biensur (three‐year means 7.23 vs 7.13 and 7.53 vs 7.09 t ha −1 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–965 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aureo and Ariosto had higher protein rates and glutenin/gliadin ratios.

Material
Aureo and Ariostoe0
Outcome
protein rates and glutenin/gliadin ratiose0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Aureo and Ariosto having higher protein rates and glutenin/gliadin ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1100 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein subunit proportions showed a strong variety by application-method interaction.

Treatment
N application methode0
Outcome
proportions of protein subunitse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“strong ‘variety × N application method’ interaction in the proportions of protein subunits within each class, particularly LMW‐GS and gliadins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1261 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biensur showed higher nitrogen uptake efficiency.

Material
Biensure0
Outcome
N uptake efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher N uptake efficiency, although as apparent balance, combined with higher HMW/LMW‐GS ratio in var. Biensur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1401 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biensur showed a higher HMW/LMW‐GS ratio.

Material
Biensure0
Outcome
HMW/LMW‐GS ratioe0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“higher N uptake efficiency, although as apparent balance, combined with higher HMW/LMW‐GS ratio in var. Biensur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1401 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Late-season foliar nitrogen allows fertilizer saving.

Outcome
N fertilizer savinge0
Setting
northern Mediterranean areae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Late‐season foliar N fertilization allows N fertilizer saving, potentially providing environmental benefits in the rainy climate of the northern Mediterranean area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1577 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar nitrogen led to variety-dependent up-regulation of LMW-GS and gliadins.

Treatment
foliart0
Outcome
LMW‐GS and gliadinse0
Direction
up‐regulatione0
Comparator
soilt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat varieties under late‐season foliar versus soil application of nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–136 · show in text ↑
e0

“leads to variety‐dependent up‐regulation of essential LMW‐GS and gliadins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1661 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

High quality in high-yielding Biensur suggests potential for mono-varietal semolina.

Material
Biensure0
Outcome
potential as a mono‐varietal semolina for pasta productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“durum wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“high quality in the specific high‐yielding variety Biensur, suggesting its potential as a mono‐varietal semolina for pasta production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1828–1961 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.