Paper · 2017

Study of Nano Silicon and Nano Titanium role in yield and yield components of durum wheat

اصغر عبادی; اصغر مهربان; یاسر حسینی; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

For study of the effect of silicon and titanium nanoparticles on yield and yield components of durum wheat, a factorial experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design at Moghan Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources in the 2016-17 crop seasons. In this sdudy, 18 advanced durum wheat genotypes, introduced from the International Center for Agricultural Research in Arid Areas (ICARDA), as the first factor and foliaring nanoparticles at three levels of titanium, silicon and control as the second factor were studied. The length of each experimental plot is 3 meters and the distance between the rows is 20 cm and the planting density is 400 plants per square meter. Nanoparticle foliar spraying was carried out at three stage includs late vegetative, Early to shoot and early spike stages. After physiological maturity, 10 plants per plot were selected randomly and their performance and other related traits were recorded. Analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference between genotypes for all studied traits. The effect of spraying with silicon and titanium nanoparticles was also significant on most traits such as plant length, peduncle length, spike length, number and weight of grain per spike, straw weight and grain yield per plant. Also, the results showed that the genotypes showed different responses to treatments of foliar spraying application. G2, G3 and G13 genotypes had the highest grain weight per plant. Overall, nano-titanium application showed the highest yield per plant compared to control and nano-silicon. However, no significant difference was observed between spraying with nano-silicone and control in grain yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat genotypes differed significantly among each other for all studied traits.

Outcome
all studied traitse1
Qualifier
between genotypese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield components of durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–106 · show in text ↑
e1

“Analysis of variance showed that there was a significant difference between genotypes for all studied traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying with silicon and titanium nanoparticles had a significant effect on plant length, peduncle length and spike length.

Treatment
spraying with silicon and titanium nanoparticlese2
Outcome
plant length, peduncle length, spike lengthe2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield components of durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–106 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effect of spraying with silicon and titanium nanoparticles was also significant on most traits such as plant length, peduncle length, spike length, number and weight of grain per spike, straw weight and grain yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying with silicon and titanium nanoparticles had a significant effect on number and weight of grain per spike and straw weight.

Treatment
spraying with silicon and titanium nanoparticlese2
Outcome
number and weight of grain per spike, straw weighte2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield components of durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–106 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effect of spraying with silicon and titanium nanoparticles was also significant on most traits such as plant length, peduncle length, spike length, number and weight of grain per spike, straw weight and grain yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1285 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar spraying with silicon and titanium nanoparticles had a significant effect on grain yield per plant.

Treatment
spraying with silicon and titanium nanoparticlese2
Outcome
grain yield per plante2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield components of durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–106 · show in text ↑
e2

“The effect of spraying with silicon and titanium nanoparticles was also significant on most traits such as plant length, peduncle length, spike length, number and weight of grain per spike, straw weight and grain yield per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1285 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Durum wheat genotypes showed different responses to foliar spraying treatments.

Treatment
foliar spraying applicatione3
Outcome
responses to treatmentse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield components of durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–106 · show in text ↑
e3

“the genotypes showed different responses to treatments of foliar spraying application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1317–1402 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes G2, G3 and G13 had the highest grain weight per plant.

Material
G2, G3 and G13e4
Outcome
grain weight per plante4
Direction
higheste4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield components of durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–106 · show in text ↑
e4

“G2, G3 and G13 genotypes had the highest grain weight per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1404–1467 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-titanium application gave the highest yield per plant compared with control and nano-silicon.

Treatment
nano-titanium applicatione5
Outcome
yield per plante5
Direction
higheste5
Comparator
control and nano-silicone5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield components of durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–106 · show in text ↑
e5

“nano-titanium application showed the highest yield per plant compared to control and nano-silicon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1575 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with nano-silicon did not differ significantly from control in grain yield.

Treatment
spraying with nano-siliconee6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
no significant differencee6
Comparator
controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield and yield components of durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 65–106 · show in text ↑
e6

“no significant difference was observed between spraying with nano-silicone and control in grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1586–1687 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.