Paper · 2017 · Journal of Crop production and processing

Feasibility of Cycloxydim Herbicide Application in Maize (Zea mays) Weed Control

Majid Anabestani; Ebrahim Izadi-Darbandi; Mehdi Rastgoo; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In order to study chemical weed control in cycloxydim tolerant maize (CTM) using cycloxydim herbicide, an experiment was carried out in a randomized complete block design with three replications during 2014. Treatments included conventional corn herbicides application (Nicosulforun, Foramsulfuron, Eradican and 2, 4-D + MCPA) in their recommended doses and combined treatment of cycloxydim + (dicamba + tritosulfuron) at their recommended and reduced doses which were used as split and complete application. Results showed that application of combined treatment of cycloxydim + (dicamba + tritosulfuron) with more than 150 g a.i. ha-1 was more effective in weeds control as compared with other herbicide treatments. The highest weed control was observed in cycloxidim application at 300 and 150 g a.i. ha-1 in 3-4 leaf stage of corn plus application of dicamba + tritosulfuron at 100 + 50 g a.i. ha-1 in 5-6 leaf stage of corn, leading to 85% decrease in weed density and biomass. The lowest weed control was observed in Eradican application at the rate of 4.1 kg a.i. ha-1 + 2,4- D + MCPA 1012 g a.i. ha-1 at 5-6 leaves stage of corn, as it led to only 55% weed control. The effect of herbicide application treatments on corn grain yield and biomass were not significant, however the highest and the lowest yield were observed in above mentioned treatments, respectively. It could be concluded that application of cycloxidim in CTM, particularly when sustainable weed management and weed seed bank management and environmental hazards of chemical weed control are concerned, is recommended.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycloxydim plus dicamba and tritosulfuron above 150 g active ingredient per hectare controlled weeds more effectively than other herbicides.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
cycloxydim + (dicamba + tritosulfuron) with more than 150 g a.i. ha-1e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
weeds controle0
Direction
more effectivee0
Comparator
other herbicide treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of combined treatment of cycloxydim + (dicamba + tritosulfuron) with more than 150 g a.i. ha-1 was more effective in weeds control as compared with other herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–715 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The staged cycloxidim and dicamba plus tritosulfuron application reduced weed density and biomass by 85%.

Treatment
cycloxidim application at 300 and 150 g a.i. ha-1 in 3-4 leaf stage of corn plus application of dicamba + tritosulfuron at 100 + 50 g a.i. ha-1 in 5-6 leaf stage of corne0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density and biomasse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
85%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest weed control was observed in cycloxidim application at 300 and 150 g a.i. ha-1 in 3-4 leaf stage of corn plus application of dicamba + tritosulfuron at 100 + 50 g a.i. ha-1 in 5-6 leaf stage of corn, leading to 85% decrease in weed density and biomass.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eradican plus 2,4-D and MCPA gave the lowest weed control, at 55%.

Treatment
Eradican application at the rate of 4.1 kg a.i. ha-1 + 2,4- D + MCPA 1012 g a.i. ha-1e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
loweste0
Value
55%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest weed control was observed in Eradican application at the rate of 4.1 kg a.i. ha-1 + 2,4- D + MCPA 1012 g a.i. ha-1 at 5-6 leaves stage of corn, as it led to only 55% weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1172 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatments had no significant effect on corn grain yield or biomass.

Treatment
herbicide application treatmentse0
Outcome
corn grain yield and biomasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of herbicide application treatments on corn grain yield and biomass were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1272 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest yield occurred with the staged cycloxidim combination.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
higheste0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
above mentioned treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest and the lowest yield were observed in above mentioned treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest yield occurred with Eradican plus 2,4-D and MCPA.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Outcome
lowest yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Qualifier
above mentioned treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest and the lowest yield were observed in above mentioned treatments, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1282–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend cycloxidim application in cycloxydim-tolerant maize for sustainable weed management.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
application of cycloxidim in CTMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of cycloxidim in CTM, particularly when sustainable weed management and weed seed bank management and environmental hazards of chemical weed control are concerned, is recommended”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–67 · show in text ↑

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

dicamba · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 24 positive, 10 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

cycloxydim · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

150 papers in the same direction as this paper · 500 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.