Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the winter (Rabi) season at Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana for two years to study the effect of time of cutting for forage on grain quality, grain yield, green fodder yield and economics of dual purpose barley varieties. The treatments, comprising the uncut, one green foliage cut (45 and 60 days after sowing), were evaluated against three varieties (PL 172, PL 426 and RD 2552). Barley variety PL 172 produced significantly higher green fodder yield (10.5 t ha-1) than the other two varieties i.e. PL 426 and RD 2552. The varieties RD 2552 (3.9 t ha-1) and PL 172 (4.2 t ha-1) were statistically at par but gave significantly higher grain yield than PL 426 (3.6 t ha-1). The variety RD 2552 gave higher net returns of Rs 41660 ha-1 than other two varieties i.e. PL 172 (Rs 27229 ha-1) and PL 426 (Rs 22194 ha-1). The forage cut at 60 days after sowing (DAS), produced significantly higher green fodder (13.4 t ha-1) than the forage cut at 45 DAS. The uncut crop and cut crop at 45 DAS produced significantly higher grain yield (4.6 and 4.5 t ha-1) yield than the cut crop at 60 DAS. The cutting of barley for fodder at 45 DAS gave higher net returns (Rs 24284 ha-1) than the forage cut at 60 DAS and uncut crop.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
PL 172 produced 10.5 t ha-1 fodder, significantly more than PL 426 and RD 2552.
- Taxon
- Barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Material
- PL 172e0
- Outcome
- green fodder yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 10.5 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- PL 426 and RD 2552e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Barley variety PL 172 produced significantly higher green fodder yield (10.5 t ha-1) than the other two varieties i.e. PL 426 and RD 2552.”
Claim · model-written summary
RD 2552 yielded 3.9 t ha-1 grain and exceeded PL 426.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Material
- RD 2552e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 3.9 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- PL 426e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The varieties RD 2552 (3.9 t ha-1) and PL 172 (4.2 t ha-1) were statistically at par but gave significantly higher grain yield than PL 426 (3.6 t ha-1).”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
PL 172 yielded 4.2 t ha-1 grain and exceeded PL 426.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Material
- PL 172e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.2 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- PL 426e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The varieties RD 2552 (3.9 t ha-1) and PL 172 (4.2 t ha-1) were statistically at par but gave significantly higher grain yield than PL 426 (3.6 t ha-1).”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
RD 2552 net returns were Rs 41660 ha-1, above the other varieties.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Material
- RD 2552e0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs 41660 ha-1e0
- Comparator
- PL 172e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The variety RD 2552 gave higher net returns of Rs 41660 ha-1 than other two varieties i.e. PL 172 (Rs 27229 ha-1) and PL 426 (Rs 22194 ha-1).”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Cutting at 60 DAS yielded 13.4 t ha-1 fodder, significantly more than cutting at 45 DAS.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- forage cut at 60 days after sowinge0
- Outcome
- green foddere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 13.4 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- forage cut at 45 DASe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The forage cut at 60 days after sowing (DAS), produced significantly higher green fodder (13.4 t ha-1) than the forage cut at 45 DAS.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Uncut barley yielded 4.6 t ha-1 grain, significantly above cutting at 60 DAS.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- uncut crope0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.6e0
- Comparator
- cut crop at 60 DASe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The uncut crop and cut crop at 45 DAS produced significantly higher grain yield (4.6 and 4.5 t ha-1) yield than the cut crop at 60 DAS.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Barley cut at 45 DAS yielded 4.5 t ha-1 grain, significantly above cutting at 60 DAS.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- cut crop at 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.5 t ha-1e0
- Comparator
- cut crop at 60 DASe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The uncut crop and cut crop at 45 DAS produced significantly higher grain yield (4.6 and 4.5 t ha-1) yield than the cut crop at 60 DAS.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Cutting barley at 45 DAS gave Rs 24284 ha-1 net returns, above 60 DAS and uncut barley.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- cutting of barley for fodder at 45 DASe0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs 24284 ha-1e0
- Comparator
- forage cut at 60 DAS and uncut crope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The cutting of barley for fodder at 45 DAS gave higher net returns (Rs 24284 ha-1) than the forage cut at 60 DAS and uncut crop.”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.