Paper · 2001 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Productivity and profitability of wheat (Triticum aestivum) as influenced by different cropping systems and nutrient sources

RAKESH KUMAR VERMA; YASHBIR SINGH SHIVAY; DINESH KUMAR; et al.

12
claims
38
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the winter (rabi) seasons of 201415 and 201516 at New Delhi, to evaluate the effects of cropping systems and nutrient sources on yield attributes, yields and economics of wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol]. Of the tested cropping systems, direct-seeded basmati rice (DSBR) (Oryza sativa L.)wheatmungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] system exhibited the highest values of yield at- tributes, viz. effective tillers, grains/spike and 1,000-seed weight which led to the highest grain yield (4.44 t/ha) and wheat equivalent yield (WEY) (11.7 t/ha). Among the nutrient sources, application of 50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 25% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost (VC) + bio-fertilizer re- sulted in the highest yield attributes, grain (4.76 t/ha) and straw (6.86 t/ha) yields and gross returns (105.07 103 /ha) followed by 50% RDF + 25% RDN through leaf compost (LC) + bio-fertilizer. A strong positive correlation (r2 = 0.690.97) was also observed between yield attributes (effective tillers/m2 and grains/spike) and yield of wheat. The uptake of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) in grain and straw of wheat remained statistically identical in DSBRwheatfallow and DSBRwheatmungbean systems. Application of 50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + bio-fertilizer registered significantly the highest uptake of N, P and K in both grain and straw of wheat and found on a par with 50% RDF + 25% RDN-LC + bio-fertilizer and 100% RDF. On the basis of net returns an application of 100% RDF was found superior to all the treatments. Therefore, DSBRwheatmungbean cropping system in conjunction with 50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + bio-fertilizer or 50% RDF + 25% RDN-LC + bio-fertilizer significantly improved the yield attributes, leading to higher productivity and profitability of wheat over the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The direct-seeded basmati rice-wheat-mungbean system gave the highest yield attributes of wheat.

Treatment
direct-seeded basmati rice (DSBR) (Oryza sativa L.)wheatmungbeane1
Outcome
effective tillers, grains/spike and 1,000-seed weighte2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
the tested cropping systemse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“direct-seeded basmati rice (DSBR) (Oryza sativa L.)wheatmungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–398 · show in text ↑
e2

“effective tillers, grains/spike and 1,000-seed weight which led to the highest grain yield (4.44 t/ha) and wheat equivalent yield (WEY) (11.7 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–603 · show in text ↑
e3

“Of the tested cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The direct-seeded basmati rice-wheat-mungbean system gave the highest wheat grain yield, 4.44 t/ha.

Treatment
direct-seeded basmati rice (DSBR) (Oryza sativa L.)wheatmungbeane1
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
4.44 t/hae2
Comparator
the tested cropping systemse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“direct-seeded basmati rice (DSBR) (Oryza sativa L.)wheatmungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–398 · show in text ↑
e2

“effective tillers, grains/spike and 1,000-seed weight which led to the highest grain yield (4.44 t/ha) and wheat equivalent yield (WEY) (11.7 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–603 · show in text ↑
e3

“Of the tested cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The direct-seeded basmati rice-wheat-mungbean system gave a higher wheat equivalent yield, 11.7 t/ha.

Treatment
direct-seeded basmati rice (DSBR) (Oryza sativa L.)wheatmungbeane1
Outcome
wheat equivalent yield (WEY)e2
Direction
higherinferrede2
Value
11.7 t/hae2
Comparator
the tested cropping systemse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e1

“direct-seeded basmati rice (DSBR) (Oryza sativa L.)wheatmungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek] system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–398 · show in text ↑
e2

“effective tillers, grains/spike and 1,000-seed weight which led to the highest grain yield (4.44 t/ha) and wheat equivalent yield (WEY) (11.7 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–603 · show in text ↑
e3

“Of the tested cropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–293 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer 50% RDF + 25% RDN as vermicompost plus bio-fertilizer gave the highest wheat grain yield, 4.76 t/ha.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 25% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost (VC) + bio-fertilizere5
Outcome
graine4
Direction
higheste6
Value
4.76 t/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e4

“grain (4.76 t/ha) and straw (6.86 t/ha) yields and gross returns (105.07 103 /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–899 · show in text ↑
e5

“50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 25% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost (VC) + bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–773 · show in text ↑
e6

“the highest yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same vermicompost plus bio-fertilizer treatment gave the highest wheat straw yield, 6.86 t/ha.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 25% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost (VC) + bio-fertilizere5
Outcome
strawe4
Direction
higheste6
Value
6.86 t/hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e4

“grain (4.76 t/ha) and straw (6.86 t/ha) yields and gross returns (105.07 103 /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–899 · show in text ↑
e5

“50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 25% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost (VC) + bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–773 · show in text ↑
e6

“the highest yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–816 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same vermicompost plus bio-fertilizer treatment gave higher gross returns, 105.07 (10^3)/ha.

Treatment
50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 25% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost (VC) + bio-fertilizere5
Outcome
gross returnse4
Direction
higherinferrede6
Value
105.07 103 /hae4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e4

“grain (4.76 t/ha) and straw (6.86 t/ha) yields and gross returns (105.07 103 /ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–899 · show in text ↑
e5

“50% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF) + 25% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost (VC) + bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–773 · show in text ↑
e6

“the highest yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–816 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield attributes were strongly and positively correlated with wheat yield.

Treatment
yield attributese7
Outcome
yield of wheate7
Direction
positive correlatione7
Value
r2 = 0.690.97e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e7

“A strong positive correlation (r2 = 0.690.97) was also observed between yield attributes (effective tillers/m2 and grains/spike) and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 974–1121 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake in wheat grain and straw was statistically identical between the two rice-wheat systems.

Organ / stage
grain and strawe7
Outcome
uptake of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K)e7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e7

“The uptake of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) in grain and straw of wheat remained statistically identical”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer 50% RDF + 25% RDN as vermicompost plus bio-fertilizer gave significantly the highest N, P and K uptake in wheat grain and straw.

Organ / stage
grain and strawe7
Treatment
50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + bio-fertilizere7
Outcome
uptake of N, P and Ke7
Direction
higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e7

“Application of 50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + bio-fertilizer registered significantly the highest uptake of N, P and K in both grain and straw of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1438 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full recommended dose 100% RDF gave the highest net returns, superior to all other treatments.

Treatment
100% RDFe7
Outcome
net returnse7
Direction
superiore7
Comparator
all the treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e7

“On the basis of net returns an application of 100% RDF was found superior to all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1610 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice-wheat-mungbean system with 50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + bio-fertilizer significantly improved wheat yield attributes over the control.

Treatment
50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + bio-fertilizere5
Outcome
yield attributese6
Direction
improvede6
Comparator
the controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e6

“significantly improved the yield attributes, leading to higher productivity and profitability of wheat over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1875 · show in text ↑
e5

“in conjunction with 50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1714 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The rice-wheat-mungbean system with 50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + bio-fertilizer gave higher wheat productivity and profitability than the control.

Treatment
50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + bio-fertilizere5
Outcome
productivity and profitability of wheate6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
the controle6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“economics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–216 · show in text ↑
e6

“significantly improved the yield attributes, leading to higher productivity and profitability of wheat over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1875 · show in text ↑
e5

“in conjunction with 50% RDF + 25% RDN-VC + bio-fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1714 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.