Paper · 2017 · Agronomy Journal

Yield and Nutrient Removal in Potato‐Based Conservation Agriculture Cropping Systems in the High Altitude Andean Region of Ecuador

Robert S. Gallagher; Richard C. Stehouwer; Víctor Hugo Barrera Mosquera; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Conservation agriculture practices evaluated in this study were agronomically effective, but expensive. Reduced tillage resulted in similar yields in all crops of the potato–oat/vetch–barley–faba rotation to conventional tillage. Retaining crop and cover crops residues in the field rather than for animal fodder will make the greatest contribution to soil nutrient cycling, but likely to be the least accepted conservation agriculture practice evaluated in this study by regional farmers. The Illangama region of Ecuador's highlands is typical of much of the Andean region throughout South and Central America. Steep slopes, frequent soil disturbance and the short fallow periods threaten the sustainability of soil quality and crop production in this region. We evaluated several conservation agricultural practices, including deviation ditches, crop residue retention, and reduced tillage in the context of a potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)–oat/vetch ( Avena sativa L. /Vicia sativa L.)–barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)–faba bean ( Vicia faba L.) rotation from 2011 to 2014 on crop productivity, crop and soil nutrient concentration, and nutrient removal from the system. Crop productivity tended to be higher in plots that had deviation ditches, and where crop and cover residues were retained in the field. Reduced tillage systems had yields similar to conventional tillage systems in all crops. Retaining crop and cover crop residues in the field had the greatest impact on recycling nutrients back to the soil, but was also the most costly conservation practice that we evaluated. Overall, conservation agricultural practices showed considerable agronomic promise for cropping systems in the Illangama region of Ecuador, but will require a longer evaluation period and a comprehensive outreach plan to help gain acceptance with regional farmers. Retaining crop and cover crops residues in the field rather than for animal fodder will make the greatest contribution to soil nutrient cycling, but likely to be the least accepted conservation agriculture (CA) practice evaluated in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture practices were agronomically effective but expensive in the potato-based rotation.

Outcome
agronomically effectivee6
Qualifier
but expensivee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–953 · show in text ↑
e6

“Conservation agriculture practices evaluated in this study were agronomically effective, but expensive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 11–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage gave yields similar to conventional tillage in all crops of the rotation.

Treatment
Reduced tillagee3
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
similare3
Comparator
conventional tillagee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–953 · show in text ↑
e3

“Reduced tillage systems had yields similar to conventional tillage systems in all crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1318–1405 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining crop and cover crop residues in the field had the greatest impact on recycling nutrients back to the soil.

Treatment
Retaining crop and cover crop residues in the fielde4
Outcome
recycling nutrients back to the soile4
Direction
greatest impacte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–953 · show in text ↑
e4

“Retaining crop and cover crop residues in the field had the greatest impact on recycling nutrients back to the soil, but was also the most costly conservation practice that we evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining crop and cover crop residues in the field was the most costly conservation practice evaluated.

Treatment
Retaining crop and cover crop residues in the fielde4
Outcome
conservation practicee4
Direction
most costlye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–953 · show in text ↑
e4

“Retaining crop and cover crop residues in the field had the greatest impact on recycling nutrients back to the soil, but was also the most costly conservation practice that we evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1407–1592 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deviation ditches tended to raise crop productivity in the potato-based rotation.

Treatment
deviation ditchese1
Outcome
Crop productivitye1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–953 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crop productivity tended to be higher in plots that had deviation ditches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1254 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Retaining crop and cover residues in the field tended to raise crop productivity.

Treatment
crop and cover residues were retained in the fielde2
Outcome
Crop productivitye1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–953 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crop productivity tended to be higher in plots that had deviation ditches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1254 · show in text ↑
e2

“where crop and cover residues were retained in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1316 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture showed considerable agronomic promise in the Illangama region of Ecuador.

Outcome
considerable agronomic promisee5
Setting
Illangama region of Ecuadore5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–953 · show in text ↑
e5

“Overall, conservation agricultural practices showed considerable agronomic promise for cropping systems in the Illangama region of Ecuador, but will require a longer evaluation period and a comprehensive outreach plan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1811 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture practices will require a longer evaluation period and a comprehensive outreach plan.

Outcome
a longer evaluation period and a comprehensive outreach plane5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–953 · show in text ↑
e5

“Overall, conservation agricultural practices showed considerable agronomic promise for cropping systems in the Illangama region of Ecuador, but will require a longer evaluation period and a comprehensive outreach plan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1594–1811 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results differ

52 papers: 34 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.