Paper · 2005 · Weed Technology

Managing Volunteer Potato (Solanum tuberosum) in Field Corn with Mesotrione and Arthropod Herbivory

Rick A. Boydston; Martin M. Williams

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Volunteer potato is becoming increasingly detrimental in potato production regions. We assessed methods to manage the weed in field corn with herbicides and arthropod herbivory. In greenhouse trials, new tuber production was reduced at least 95% in ‘Ranger Russet’, ‘Russet Burbank’, ‘Russet Norkotah’, and ‘Shepody’ potato varieties by mesotrione applied at 0.11 kg/ha. In field studies conducted near Paterson, WA, a single application of mesotrione at 0.07 or 0.11 kg/ha applied at the time of tuber initiation (mid-postemergence [MPOST]) controlled potato top growth 96 to 98% in 2002 and 2003. Mesotrione applied at earlier stages of potato growth, preemergence or early postemergence, controlled potatoes less than mesotrione applied MPOST. All herbicide treatments prevented yield loss in field corn compared with nontreated checks. Mesotrione reduced new potato tubers and tuber weight more than any other herbicide. Herbivory of volunteer potato by Colorado potato beetle reduced tuber number 21% and tuber density 23% in the absence of herbicides and appeared to further suppress the weed in combination with herbicides. Whereas treatments containing mesotrione were most effective against volunteer potato, arthropod herbivory supplemented weed suppression and may be an important component in reduced or low-input weed management systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione reduced new tuber production at least 95% in four potato varieties.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Treatment
mesotrione applied at 0.11 kg/hae0
Interactor
potatoSolanum tuberosume0weed
Outcome
new tuber productione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
at least 95%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“new tuber production was reduced at least 95% in ‘Ranger Russet’, ‘Russet Burbank’, ‘Russet Norkotah’, and ‘Shepody’ potato varieties by mesotrione applied at 0.11 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–369 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Field Corn with Mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPOST mesotrione at 0.07 kg/ha controlled volunteer potato top growth 96 to 98%.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Treatment
mesotrione at 0.07e0
Interactor
potatoSolanum tuberosume0weed
Outcome
potato top growthe0
Direction
controllede0
Value
96 to 98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single application of mesotrione at 0.07 or 0.11 kg/ha applied at the time of tuber initiation (mid-postemergence [MPOST]) controlled potato top growth 96 to 98% in 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Field Corn with Mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MPOST mesotrione at 0.11 kg/ha controlled volunteer potato top growth 96 to 98%.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Treatment
0.11 kg/hae0
Interactor
potatoSolanum tuberosume0weed
Outcome
potato top growthe0
Direction
controllede0
Value
96 to 98%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a single application of mesotrione at 0.07 or 0.11 kg/ha applied at the time of tuber initiation (mid-postemergence [MPOST]) controlled potato top growth 96 to 98% in 2002 and 2003”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 417–597 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Field Corn with Mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Earlier mesotrione applications controlled potato less than MPOST treatment.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Treatment
Mesotrione applied at earlier stages of potato growthe0
Interactor
potatoSolanum tuberosume0weed
Outcome
potatoese0
Direction
less thane0
Comparator
mesotrione applied MPOSTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mesotrione applied at earlier stages of potato growth, preemergence or early postemergence, controlled potatoes less than mesotrione applied MPOST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–746 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Field Corn with Mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicide treatments prevented corn yield loss versus untreated checks.

Taxon
field corne0
Treatment
All herbicide treatmentse0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
preventede0
Comparator
nontreated checkse0

Verbatim

e0

“All herbicide treatments prevented yield loss in field corn compared with nontreated checks.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione reduced new potato tuber number more than other herbicides.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Treatment
Mesotrionee0
Interactor
potatoSolanum tuberosume0weed
Outcome
new potato tuberse0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
any other herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mesotrione reduced new potato tubers and tuber weight more than any other herbicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Field Corn with Mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesotrione reduced potato tuber weight more than other herbicides.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Treatment
Mesotrionee0
Interactor
potatoSolanum tuberosume0weed
Outcome
tuber weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
any other herbicidee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · InteractorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mesotrione reduced new potato tubers and tuber weight more than any other herbicide.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–924 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Field Corn with Mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Colorado potato beetle herbivory reduced volunteer potato tuber number by 21% without herbicides.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Treatment
Herbivory of volunteer potato by Colorado potato beetlee0
Interactor
volunteer potatoe0weed
Second interactor
Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae0herbivore
Outcome
tuber numbere0
Direction
reducede0
Value
21%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · Second interactorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbivory of volunteer potato by Colorado potato beetle reduced tuber number 21% and tuber density 23% in the absence of herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Field Corn with Mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beetle herbivory reduced volunteer potato tuber density by 23% without herbicides.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Treatment
Herbivory of volunteer potato by Colorado potato beetlee0
Interactor
volunteer potatoe0weed
Second interactor
Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae0herbivore
Outcome
tuber densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leptinotarsa decemlineata
Leptinotarsa decemlineata · Second interactorScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Herbivory of volunteer potato by Colorado potato beetle reduced tuber number 21% and tuber density 23% in the absence of herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Field Corn with Mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beetle herbivory appeared to further suppress volunteer potato with herbicides.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Interactor
volunteer potatot1weed
Outcome
suppress the weede0
Direction
further suppresse0

Verbatim

e0

“appeared to further suppress the weed in combination with herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1061–1129 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Field Corn with Mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75 · show in text ↑
t1

“Volunteer potato”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 9–25 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest arthropod herbivory as part of reduced-input weed management.

Taxon
Field Cornt0
Outcome
arthropod herbivory supplemented weed suppression and may be an important component in reduced or low-input weed management systemse0

Verbatim

e0

“arthropod herbivory supplemented weed suppression and may be an important component in reduced or low-input weed management systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“in Field Corn with Mesotrione”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–75 · show in text ↑

mesotrione · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Solanum tuberosum · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Solanum tuberosum · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

grazing · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

36 papers: 11 positive, 25 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.