Paper · 2017 · PLoS ONE

Stem carbohydrate dynamics and expression of genes involved in fructan accumulation and remobilization during grain growth in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes with contrasting tolerance to water stress

Alejandra Yáñez; Gerardo Tapia; Fernando Guerra; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
42
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The genetic and physiological mechanisms underlying the relationship between water-soluble carbohydrates (WSC) and water stress tolerance are scarcely known. This study aimed to evaluate the main WSC in stems, and the expression of genes involved in fructan metabolism in wheat genotypes growing in a glasshouse with water stress (WS; 50% field capacity from heading) and full irrigation (FI; 100% field capacity). Eight wheat genotypes (five tolerant and three susceptible to water stress) were evaluated initially (experiment 1) and the two most contrasting genotypes in terms of WSC accumulation were evaluated in a subsequent experiment (experiment 2). Maximum accumulation of WSC occurred 10-20 days after anthesis. Under WS, the stress-tolerant genotype exhibited higher concentrations of WSC, glucose, fructose and fructan in the stems, compared to FI. In addition, the stress-tolerant genotype exhibited higher up-regulation of the fructan 1-fructosyltransferase B (1-FFTB) and fructan 1-exohydrolase w2 (1-FEHw2) genes, whereas the susceptible cultivar presented an up-regulation of the fructan 6-fructosyltransferase (6-SFT) and fructan 1-exohydrolase w3 (1-FEHw3) genes. Our results indicated clear differences in the pattern of WSC accumulation and the expression of genes regulating fructan metabolism between the tolerant and susceptible genotypes under WS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, the stress-tolerant wheat genotype had higher stem concentrations of WSC, glucose and fructose than under full irrigation.

Material
stress-tolerant genotypee1
Organ / stage
stemse1
Treatment
water stress (WS; 50% field capacity from heading)e0
Outcome
WSC, glucose, fructosee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
full irrigation (FI; 100% field capacity)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing in a glasshouse with water stress (WS; 50% field capacity from heading) and full irrigation (FI; 100% field capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–413 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under WS, the stress-tolerant genotype exhibited higher concentrations of WSC, glucose, fructose and fructan in the stems, compared to FI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–858 · show in text ↑
e5

“Eight wheat genotypes (five tolerant and three susceptible to water stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–490 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under water stress, the stress-tolerant wheat genotype had higher stem fructan than under full irrigation.

Material
stress-tolerant genotypee1
Organ / stage
stemse1
Treatment
water stress (WS; 50% field capacity from heading)e0
Outcome
fructane1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
full irrigation (FI; 100% field capacity)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growing in a glasshouse with water stress (WS; 50% field capacity from heading) and full irrigation (FI; 100% field capacity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–413 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under WS, the stress-tolerant genotype exhibited higher concentrations of WSC, glucose, fructose and fructan in the stems, compared to FI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–858 · show in text ↑
e5

“Eight wheat genotypes (five tolerant and three susceptible to water stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–490 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stress-tolerant wheat genotype showed higher up-regulation of 1-FFTB and 1-FEHw2 than the susceptible cultivar.

Material
stress-tolerant genotypee2
Gene
1-FFTBe2
Outcome
up-regulatione2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
1-FEHw2e2
Comparator
susceptible cultivare3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“the stress-tolerant genotype exhibited higher up-regulation of the fructan 1-fructosyltransferase B (1-FFTB) and fructan 1-exohydrolase w2 (1-FEHw2) genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–1027 · show in text ↑
e3

“whereas the susceptible cultivar presented an up-regulation of the fructan 6-fructosyltransferase (6-SFT) and fructan 1-exohydrolase w3 (1-FEHw3) genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1180 · show in text ↑
e5

“Eight wheat genotypes (five tolerant and three susceptible to water stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–490 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The susceptible wheat cultivar showed up-regulation of 6-SFT and 1-FEHw3 under water stress.

Material
susceptible cultivare3
Gene
6-SFTe3
Outcome
up-regulatione3
Direction
up-regulatione3
Qualifier
1-FEHw3e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“whereas the susceptible cultivar presented an up-regulation of the fructan 6-fructosyltransferase (6-SFT) and fructan 1-exohydrolase w3 (1-FEHw3) genes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1180 · show in text ↑
e5

“Eight wheat genotypes (five tolerant and three susceptible to water stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–490 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum accumulation of WSC in wheat stems occurred 10-20 days after anthesis.

Outcome
Maximum accumulation of WSCe4
Value
10-20 days after anthesise4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Maximum accumulation of WSC occurred 10-20 days after anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–719 · show in text ↑
e5

“Eight wheat genotypes (five tolerant and three susceptible to water stress)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 415–490 · show in text ↑

drought · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

52 papers: 11 positive, 41 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 56 positive, 69 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.