Paper · 1984 · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology

Effects of Drought and High Temperature on Grain Growth in Wheat

ME Nicolas; RM Gleadow; MJ Dalling

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
170
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of two levels of temperature and of water supply on grain development of wheat (cv. Warigal) were studied by imposing treatments during the early or late period of cell division. High temperature (28°C day/20°C night) accelerated development of the grain. Dry matter accumulation and cell division proceeded at a higher rate but had a shorter duration in the high temperature treatments. Maximum cell number, final cell size and the number of large starch granules per cell were not significantly reduced by high temperature. Drought and drought × high temperature reduced the storage capacity of the grain, with a decrease in number of cells and starch granules in the endosperm. Cell size was also reduced when treatments were imposed late during cell division. Duration of dry matter accumulation and cell division was reduced in the drought and drought × high temperature treatments. The combined effects of drought and high temperature were much more severe than those of each separate treatment. The amount of sucrose per cell was similar in all treatments. It appears unlikely that the supply of sucrose to the endosperm cells is the main limiting factor of dry matter accumulation in both drought and high temperature treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature accelerated wheat grain development.

Treatment
High temperature (28°C day/20°C night)e0
Outcome
development of the graine0
Direction
acceleratede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“High temperature (28°C day/20°C night) accelerated development of the grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–267 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature raised the rate of grain dry matter accumulation and cell division.

Treatment
high temperature treatmentse0
Outcome
Dry matter accumulation and cell divisione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dry matter accumulation and cell division proceeded at a higher rate but had a shorter duration in the high temperature treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature shortened the duration of dry matter accumulation and cell division.

Treatment
high temperature treatmentse0
Outcome
Dry matter accumulation and cell divisione0
Direction
shortere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dry matter accumulation and cell division proceeded at a higher rate but had a shorter duration in the high temperature treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–399 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature did not significantly reduce maximum cell number, final cell size, or large starch granules per cell.

Treatment
high temperaturee0
Outcome
Maximum cell number, final cell size and the number of large starch granules per celle0
Direction
not significantly reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum cell number, final cell size and the number of large starch granules per cell were not significantly reduced by high temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–537 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and combined drought and high temperature reduced grain storage capacity.

Treatment
Drought and drought × high temperaturee0
Outcome
storage capacity of the graine0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought and drought × high temperature reduced the storage capacity of the grain, with a decrease in number of cells and starch granules in the endosperm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and combined drought and high temperature decreased endosperm cell and starch granule numbers.

Treatment
Drought and drought × high temperaturee0
Outcome
number of cells and starch granules in the endosperme0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Drought and drought × high temperature reduced the storage capacity of the grain, with a decrease in number of cells and starch granules in the endosperm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–692 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late cell division treatments reduced grain cell size.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
Cell sizee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
late during cell divisione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cell size was also reduced when treatments were imposed late during cell division.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and combined drought and high temperature shortened dry matter accumulation and cell division.

Treatment
drought and drought × high temperature treatmentse0
Outcome
Duration of dry matter accumulation and cell divisione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Duration of dry matter accumulation and cell division was reduced in the drought and drought × high temperature treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined drought and high temperature had more severe effects than either treatment alone.

Treatment
drought and high temperaturee0
Outcome
combined effectse0
Direction
much more severee0
Comparator
each separate treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The combined effects of drought and high temperature were much more severe than those of each separate treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1013 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose per cell was similar across treatments.

Outcome
amount of sucrose per celle0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“The amount of sucrose per cell was similar in all treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1075 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered sucrose supply unlikely to be the chief limit on dry matter accumulation under drought or heat.

Compound
sucrosee0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Qualifier
appears unlikelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“It appears unlikely that the supply of sucrose to the endosperm cells is the main limiting factor of dry matter accumulation in both drought and high temperature treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1249 · show in text ↑

heat · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

42 papers: 7 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

52 papers: 11 positive, 41 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

heat · cytology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

drought · cytology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 0 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.