Abstract
Most developing countries are hesitated in maximizing tissue culture technology due to the overhead costs involved. Therefore, this research was initiated to evaluate alternative cheap carbon sources and energy in culture media in order to reduce production input costs of sugarcane in vitro propagation. The experiment was carried out in completely randomized design (CRD) with 2 × 6 factorial treatment arrangements of genotypes and carbon source in combination. The interaction analysis of genotypes and table sugar concentration significantly influenced in vitro sugarcane multiplication. On MS medium with 50 gl-1 table sugar, B4906 gave the highest (13.42 ± 0.29) shoots, whereas Pr1013 produced a maximum of 7.78 ± 0.19 shoots at 60 gl-1 table sugar. However, 40 gl-1 table sugar was optimum to produce usable and separable shoots for further subculture of multiplication. Accordingly results showed that table sugar not only enhanced multiplication but also significantly reduced the production input costs by 94.89% when compared with the analytical grade sucrose.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Genotype and table sugar concentration interacted significantly in sugarcane multiplication.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee0
- Material
- genotypese0
- Treatment
- table sugar concentratione0
- Outcome
- sugarcane multiplicatione0
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
e0“The interaction analysis of genotypes and table sugar concentration significantly influenced in vitro sugarcane multiplication.”
Claim · model-written summary
B4906 produced the highest shoot number, 13.42 ± 0.29, on MS medium with 50 gl-1 table sugar.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee1
- Material
- B4906e0
- Treatment
- 50 gl-1 table sugare0
- Outcome
- shootse0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 13.42 ± 0.29e0
- Setting
- MS mediume0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“On MS medium with 50 gl-1 table sugar, B4906 gave the highest (13.42 ± 0.29) shoots”
e1“in vitro sugarcane multiplication”
Claim · model-written summary
Pr1013 produced a maximum of 7.78 ± 0.19 shoots at 60 gl-1 table sugar.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee1
- Material
- Pr1013e0
- Treatment
- 60 gl-1 table sugare0
- Outcome
- shootse0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 7.78 ± 0.19e0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Pr1013 produced a maximum of 7.78 ± 0.19 shoots at 60 gl-1 table sugar”
e1“in vitro sugarcane multiplication”
Claim · model-written summary
A concentration of 40 gl-1 table sugar was optimal for usable, separable shoots for subculture.
- Taxon
- sugarcanee1
- Treatment
- 40 gl-1 table sugare0
- Outcome
- usable and separable shootse0
- Direction
- optimume0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“40 gl-1 table sugar was optimum to produce usable and separable shoots for further subculture of multiplication”
e1“in vitro sugarcane multiplication”
Claim · model-written summary
Table sugar enhanced sugarcane multiplication.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“table sugar not only enhanced multiplication”
e1“in vitro sugarcane multiplication”
Claim · model-written summary
Table sugar reduced production input costs by 94.89% relative to analytical grade sucrose.
Verbatim
e0“table sugar not only enhanced multiplication but also significantly reduced the production input costs by 94.89% when compared with the analytical grade sucrose”
e1“in vitro sugarcane multiplication”
The same questions in other papers
sucrose · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →sucrose · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
sucrose · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.