Paper · 2006 · Pakistan Journal of Botany

EFFECT OF SUCROSE AND GROWTH REGULATORS ON THE MICROPROPAGATION OF SUGARCANE CLONES

Imtiaz Ahmed Khan; M. U. Dahot; Shafqat Yasmin; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
26
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The rapid multiplication of early, mid and late maturing sugarcane clones were obtained under different concentrations of commercial sugar and plant growth regulators in this study. Late maturing sugarcane clone AEC82-223 did not produce any auxillary shoot at 6% commercial sugar concentration. In contrast multiplication rate was higher in early and mid maturing sugarcane clones NIA-2004, BL4 and NIA-98, respectively. Apical meristems were cultured on modified MS medium containing different concentrations of auxins and cytokinins. An optimal multiplication was observed on M4 (1.0 mg/1 IAA + 1.0 mg/1 BAP + 0.1mg/l Kinetin) and M5 (0.l mg/1 kinetin + 1.5mg/l BAP + 1.5mg/l IAA). Maximum numbers of shoot were observed in BL4 followed by NIA-2004 when 1.0 mg/l of BAP and IAA were applied with low concentration of kinetin (0.1 mg/l). Shoot elongation and multiplication was improved on media devoid of BAP (MS+ 2 mg/1 kinetin + 2 mg/1 IBA + 2 mg/1 IAA). Best rooting was observed on media containing MS+ 1 mg/1 IBA + 6% sucrose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Late maturing clone AEC82-223 did not produce any auxiliary shoot at 6% commercial sugar.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Material
AEC82-223e1
Treatment
6% commercial sugar concentratione1
Outcome
auxillary shoote1
Direction
did not producee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“MICROPROPAGATION OF SUGARCANE CLONES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–83 · show in text ↑
e1

“Late maturing sugarcane clone AEC82-223 did not produce any auxillary shoot at 6% commercial sugar concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 182–294 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot multiplication rate was higher in early and mid maturing clones NIA-2004, BL4 and NIA-98, in contrast to the late clone.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Material
NIA-2004, BL4 and NIA-98e2
Outcome
multiplication ratee2
Direction
highere2

Schema note from the model: The "respectively" mapping of clones to early and mid maturity is ambiguous in the abstract.

Verbatim

t0

“MICROPROPAGATION OF SUGARCANE CLONES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–83 · show in text ↑
e2

“In contrast multiplication rate was higher in early and mid maturing sugarcane clones NIA-2004, BL4 and NIA-98, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum shoot numbers occurred in BL4, followed by NIA-2004, with 1.0 mg/l BAP and IAA plus low kinetin.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Material
BL4e3
Treatment
1.0 mg/l of BAP and IAAe3
Outcome
numbers of shoote3
Direction
Maximume3
Comparator
NIA-2004e3

Verbatim

t0

“MICROPROPAGATION OF SUGARCANE CLONES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–83 · show in text ↑
e3

“Maximum numbers of shoot were observed in BL4 followed by NIA-2004 when 1.0 mg/l of BAP and IAA were applied with low concentration of kinetin (0.1 mg/l)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–838 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Media M4 and M5 gave optimal multiplication of sugarcane shoots.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
modified MS medium containing different concentrations of auxins and cytokininse5
Outcome
multiplicatione4
Direction
optimale4
Qualifier
M4 (1.0 mg/1 IAA + 1.0 mg/1 BAP + 0.1mg/l Kinetin) and M5 (0.l mg/1 kinetin + 1.5mg/l BAP + 1.5mg/l IAA)e4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“MICROPROPAGATION OF SUGARCANE CLONES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–83 · show in text ↑
e4

“An optimal multiplication was observed on M4 (1.0 mg/1 IAA + 1.0 mg/1 BAP + 0.1mg/l Kinetin) and M5 (0.l mg/1 kinetin + 1.5mg/l BAP + 1.5mg/l IAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–683 · show in text ↑
e5

“Apical meristems were cultured on modified MS medium containing different concentrations of auxins and cytokinins”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 422–535 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Media without BAP improved shoot elongation and multiplication.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
media devoid of BAPe6
Outcome
Shoot elongation and multiplicatione6
Direction
improvede6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“MICROPROPAGATION OF SUGARCANE CLONES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–83 · show in text ↑
e6

“Shoot elongation and multiplication was improved on media devoid of BAP (MS+ 2 mg/1 kinetin + 2 mg/1 IBA + 2 mg/1 IAA)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MS medium with 1 mg/l IBA and 6% sucrose gave the best rooting.

Taxon
SUGARCANEt0
Treatment
MS+ 1 mg/1 IBA + 6% sucrosee7
Outcome
rootinge7
Direction
Beste7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“MICROPROPAGATION OF SUGARCANE CLONES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–83 · show in text ↑
e7

“Best rooting was observed on media containing MS+ 1 mg/1 IBA + 6% sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1033 · show in text ↑

sucrose · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

N-benzyladenine · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

in vitro · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

class · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.