Paper · 2016 · Advances in Crop Science and Technology

Table Sugar as Low Cost Option and its Concentration Effect on Shoot Multiplication of Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) Genotypes

Belete Getnet; Kassahun Bantte; Mulugeta Diro

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Most developing countries are hesitated in maximizing tissue culture technology due to the overhead costs involved. Therefore, this research was initiated to evaluate alternative cheap carbon sources and energy in culture media in order to reduce production input costs of sugarcane in vitro propagation. The experiment was carried out in completely randomized design (CRD) with 2 × 6 factorial treatment arrangements of genotypes and carbon source in combination. The interaction analysis of genotypes and table sugar concentration significantly influenced in vitro sugarcane multiplication. On MS medium with 50 gl-1 table sugar, B4906 gave the highest (13.42 ± 0.29) shoots, whereas Pr1013 produced a maximum of 7.78 ± 0.19 shoots at 60 gl-1 table sugar. However, 40 gl-1 table sugar was optimum to produce usable and separable shoots for further subculture of multiplication. Accordingly results showed that table sugar not only enhanced multiplication but also significantly reduced the production input costs by 94.89% when compared with the analytical grade sucrose.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype B4906 gave the highest shoot number, 13.42 ± 0.29, on MS medium with 50 g/l table sugar.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
B4906e1
Treatment
50 gl-1 table sugare1
Outcome
shootse1
Direction
higheste1
Value
13.42 ± 0.29e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“On MS medium with 50 gl-1 table sugar, B4906 gave the highest (13.42 ± 0.29) shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–676 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype Pr1013 produced a maximum of 7.78 ± 0.19 shoots at 60 g/l table sugar.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
Pr1013e1
Treatment
60 gl-1 table sugare1
Outcome
shootse1
Direction
maximume1
Value
7.78 ± 0.19e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas Pr1013 produced a maximum of 7.78 ± 0.19 shoots at 60 gl-1 table sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 678–756 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

40 g/l table sugar was optimal for producing usable and separable shoots for subculture.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
40 gl-1 table sugare1
Outcome
usable and separable shootse1
Direction
optimume1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“40 gl-1 table sugar was optimum to produce usable and separable shoots for further subculture of multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–878 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Table sugar reduced sugarcane in vitro production input costs by 94.89% compared with analytical grade sucrose.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
table sugare1
Outcome
production input costse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
94.89%e1
Comparator
analytical grade sucrosee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“table sugar not only enhanced multiplication but also significantly reduced the production input costs by 94.89% when compared with the analytical grade sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Table sugar enhanced in vitro sugarcane multiplication compared with analytical grade sucrose.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Treatment
table sugare1
Outcome
multiplicatione1
Direction
enhancede1
Comparator
analytical grade sucrosee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“table sugar not only enhanced multiplication but also significantly reduced the production input costs by 94.89% when compared with the analytical grade sucrose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1072 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The genotype by table sugar concentration interaction significantly influenced in vitro sugarcane multiplication.

Taxon
Saccharum officinarum L.Saccharum officinarumt0
Material
genotypese1
Treatment
table sugar concentratione1
Outcome
in vitro sugarcane multiplicatione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Saccharum officinarum
Saccharum officinarum · TaxonTon Rulkens · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“The interaction analysis of genotypes and table sugar concentration significantly influenced in vitro sugarcane multiplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–591 · show in text ↑

sucrose · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

sucrose · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.