Paper · 2017 · HortTechnology

Production System and Cultivar Effects on the Development of Skin Separation or “Silvering” in Bell Pepper Fruit

Christian A. Wyenandt; Wesley L. Kline; Daniel L. Ward; et al.

5
claims
6
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

From 2006 to 2008, four different production systems and five bell pepper cultivars ( Capsicum annuum ) with either no resistance (Alliance and Camelot), tolerance (Revolution), or resistance (Paladin and Aristotle) to the crown rot phase of phytophthora blight ( Phytophthora capsici ) were evaluated for the development of skin separation or “silvering” in fruit at a research facility and four commercial vegetable farms in southern New Jersey. Cultivar, production system, and year, each had a significant effect on the total percentage of fruit with skin separation and marketable yield. The percentage of bell pepper fruit with skin separation was higher in both phytophthora-resistant cultivars compared with the phytophthora-susceptible cultivars across all four production systems. Marketable yield was highest when bell peppers were grown in double rows on raised beds with black plastic mulch and drip irrigation compared with bell peppers grown on single rows on raised beds with black plastic mulch and drip irrigation and bell peppers grown on single rows on raised, bare ground beds with buried drip irrigation. Marketable yields were lowest when bell peppers were grown in single rows on high, ridged beds with overhead irrigation. Results of this study suggest that the development of skin separation or “silvering” in fruit is more closely associated with genotype than type of production system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar, production system, and year significantly affected fruit skin separation and marketable yield.

Taxon
fruite0
Material
Cultivare0
Outcome
total percentage of fruit with skin separation and marketable yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar, production system, and year, each had a significant effect on the total percentage of fruit with skin separation and marketable yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 448–591 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytophthora-resistant cultivars had more fruit skin separation than susceptible cultivars.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Material
phytophthora-resistant cultivarse0
Outcome
percentage of bell pepper fruit with skin separatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
phytophthora-susceptible cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“The percentage of bell pepper fruit with skin separation was higher in both phytophthora-resistant cultivars compared with the phytophthora-susceptible cultivars across all four production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double rows on raised beds with black plastic mulch and drip irrigation had the highest marketable yield among the stated systems.

Taxon
bell pepperse0
Treatment
double rows on raised beds with black plastic mulch and drip irrigatione0
Outcome
Marketable yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
single rows on raised beds with black plastic mulch and drip irrigatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable yield was highest when bell peppers were grown in double rows on raised beds with black plastic mulch and drip irrigation compared with bell peppers grown on single rows on raised beds with black plastic mulch and drip irrigation and bell peppers grown on single rows on raised, bare ground beds with buried drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single rows on high ridged beds with overhead irrigation had the lowest marketable yields.

Taxon
bell pepperse0
Treatment
single rows on high, ridged beds with overhead irrigatione0
Outcome
Marketable yieldse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable yields were lowest when bell peppers were grown in single rows on high, ridged beds with overhead irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1246 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit silvering was more closely associated with genotype than production system.

Taxon
Bell Peppert0
Material
genotypee0
Outcome
development of skin separation or “silvering” in fruite0
Direction
more closelye0
Comparator
type of production systeme0

Verbatim

e0

“the development of skin separation or “silvering” in fruit is more closely associated with genotype than type of production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1283–1413 · show in text ↑
t0

“Bell Pepper Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–112 · show in text ↑

tillage · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.