Paper · 1996 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Bell pepper yield response to carbonated irrigation water1

Craig A. Storlie; Joseph R. Heckman

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field studies were conducted to determine the influence of carbonated irrigation water on bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) yield, plant nutrient status, canopy carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, and soil pH. Marketable yield, early yield, marketable fruit size distribution, and plant nutrient status were unaffected by carbonated irrigation water. Air CO2 concentration in the lowest portion of the canopy increased during irrigation events, but returned to the ambient CO2 concentration shortly after irrigation ceased. The effect of carbonated irrigation water on soil pH was marginal and unpredictable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonated irrigation water did not change marketable or early yield or marketable fruit size distribution.

Taxon
bell peppere1
Treatment
carbonated irrigation watere0
Outcome
Marketable yield, early yield, marketable fruit size distributione0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Marketable yield, early yield, marketable fruit size distribution, and plant nutrient status were unaffected by carbonated irrigation water.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 218–358 · show in text ↑
e1

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonated irrigation water did not change plant nutrient status.

Taxon
bell peppere1
Treatment
carbonated irrigation watere0
Outcome
plant nutrient statuse0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plant nutrient status were unaffected by carbonated irrigation water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–357 · show in text ↑
e1

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Canopy air CO2 increased during irrigation and returned to ambient concentration afterward.

Taxon
bell peppere1
Treatment
irrigation eventse0
Outcome
Air CO2 concentration in the lowest portion of the canopye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
ambient CO2 concentratione0

Verbatim

e0

“Air CO2 concentration in the lowest portion of the canopy increased during irrigation events, but returned to the ambient CO2 concentration shortly after irrigation ceased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–531 · show in text ↑
e1

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–131 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbonated irrigation water had a marginal and unpredictable effect on soil pH.

Taxon
bell peppere1
Treatment
carbonated irrigation watere0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Qualifier
marginal and unpredictablee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of carbonated irrigation water on soil pH was marginal and unpredictable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–616 · show in text ↑
e1

“bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 99–131 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

irrigation · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.