Paper · 1994 · HortScience

Canopy Shade and Soil Mulch Affect Yield and Solar Injury of Bell Pepper

B. Warren Roberts; Jeffrey A. Anderson

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
46
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Experiments were conducted from 1989 to 1991 to compare the effectiveness of various cultural techniques in reducing solar injury (SI) and increasing yield of bell pepper (Capsicum annuum var. annuum `California Wonder') in southern Oklahoma. Treatments included black plastic mulch, white plastic mulch, straw mulch, living rye, spunbonded polypropylene used as a plant canopy shade, and bare soil. Marketable yields from plots shaded with spunbonded polypropylene rowcovers were equal to or greater than those from other treatments each year. Two out of 3 years, plots with a black plastic soil mulch had marketable yields lower than those from other treatments. SI was reduced by rowcover shade.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spunbonded polypropylene rowcover shade gave marketable yields of bell pepper equal to or greater than the other treatments each year.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Treatment
spunbonded polypropylene rowcoverse2
Outcome
Marketable yieldse2
Direction
equal to or greater thane2
Comparator
other treatmentse2
Setting
southern Oklahomae1

Verbatim

e0

“increasing yield of bell pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“in southern Oklahoma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–241 · show in text ↑
e2

“Marketable yields from plots shaded with spunbonded polypropylene rowcovers were equal to or greater than those from other treatments each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Black plastic soil mulch lowered marketable yields of bell pepper relative to the other treatments in two of three years.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Treatment
black plastic soil mulche3
Outcome
marketable yieldse3
Direction
lowere3
Qualifier
Two out of 3 yearse3
Comparator
other treatmentse3
Setting
southern Oklahomae1

Verbatim

e0

“increasing yield of bell pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–170 · show in text ↑
e1

“in southern Oklahoma”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–241 · show in text ↑
e3

“Two out of 3 years, plots with a black plastic soil mulch had marketable yields lower than those from other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rowcover shade reduced solar injury to bell pepper.

Taxon
bell peppere0
Treatment
rowcover shadee4
Outcome
SIe4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“increasing yield of bell pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–170 · show in text ↑
e4

“SI was reduced by rowcover shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–697 · show in text ↑

poly(propylene) · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

mulching · quality: postharvest · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.