Abstract
The influence of Arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) (Glomus deserticola and Gigaspora gigantea) were evaluated on drought tolerance and charcoal rot disease of cowpea genotypes: IT90K-277-2, IT84S-2246-4 and IT06K123-1. IT90K-277-2 and IT84S-2246-4 were sown in 3 kg of sterilized soil for drought experiment with five treatments. Treatment was established thirty days after germination with inoculation of G. deserticola, the mycorrhizal treated cowpea withstand the water stress and produced high yield. Biocontrol experiment had 2 kg sterilized soil potted into bags with cultivars IT90K-277-2 and IT06K123-1, fourteen treatments were established with soil drenched before planting and simultaneous inoculation. Soil drenched with AMF before planting and inoculation of M. phaseolina after 10 days of germination recorded higher growth parameters, while the simultaneous inoculated plant was the most effective in reducing disease severity. However, simultaneous treatment of G. deserticola, G. gigantea and M. phaseolina were most effective for both growth parameters and reduction of disease severity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
G. deserticola inoculation allowed water-stressed cowpea to withstand stress.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- inoculation of G. deserticolae0
- Interactor
- G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
- Outcome
- withstand the water stresse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with inoculation of G. deserticola, the mycorrhizal treated cowpea withstand the water stress and produced high yield”
Claim · model-written summary
G. deserticola inoculation produced high yield in water-stressed cowpea.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatae0
- Treatment
- inoculation of G. deserticolae0
- Interactor
- G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“with inoculation of G. deserticola, the mycorrhizal treated cowpea withstand the water stress and produced high yield”
Claim · model-written summary
AMF soil drenching before planting followed by M. phaseolina inoculation gave higher cowpea growth parameters.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- Soil drenched with AMF before planting and inoculation of M. phaseolina after 10 days of germinatione0
- Interactor
- M. phaseolinae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- AMFe0symbiont
- Outcome
- growth parameterse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soil drenched with AMF before planting and inoculation of M. phaseolina after 10 days of germination recorded higher growth parameters”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous inoculation was most effective in reducing cowpea charcoal rot severity.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- simultaneous inoculated plante0
- Interactor
- charcoal rot
Macrophomina phaseolinat0pathogen - Outcome
- disease severitye0
- Direction
- reducinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the simultaneous inoculated plant was the most effective in reducing disease severity”
t0“charcoal rot disease of cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous G. deserticola, G. gigantea and M. phaseolina treatment was most effective for cowpea growth parameters.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- simultaneous treatment of G. deserticola, G. gigantea and M. phaseolinae0
- Interactor
- M. phaseolinae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
- Outcome
- growth parameterse0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Qualifier
- G. giganteae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“simultaneous treatment of G. deserticola, G. gigantea and M. phaseolina were most effective for both growth parameters and reduction of disease severity”
t0“cowpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Simultaneous G. deserticola, G. gigantea and M. phaseolina treatment was most effective in reducing cowpea disease severity.
- Taxon
- cowpeaVigna unguiculatat0
- Treatment
- simultaneous treatment of G. deserticola, G. gigantea and M. phaseolinae0
- Interactor
- M. phaseolinae0pathogen
- Second interactor
- G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae0symbiont
- Outcome
- disease severitye0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Qualifier
- G. giganteae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“simultaneous treatment of G. deserticola, G. gigantea and M. phaseolina were most effective for both growth parameters and reduction of disease severity”
t0“cowpea”
The same questions in other papers
Septoglomus deserticola · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Septoglomus deserticola · disease · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
inoculation · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ
98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
112 papers more in this group
See all 116 papers →processing · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →application · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
55 papers more in this group
See all 59 papers →inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results
91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
98 papers more in this group
See all 102 papers →inoculation · Macrophomina phaseolina · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
mycorrhiza · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.