Paper · 2012 · African Journal of Microbiology Research

Endophytic and rhizospheric bacteria from Opuntia ficus-indica mill and their ability to promote plant growth in cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp

Eduardo de Carvalho Costa Francisco; Soares de Melo Itamar

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
31
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Studies on the biodiversity of plant­s associated microorganisms play an important role in food production. Ficus-tree, Opuntia ficus-indica Mill, are cultivated in many nations worldwide intercropping with other cultures, like cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. The objectives of this study were to isolate and determine the diversity of bacterial endophytes and rhizobacteria in cacti and their ability to solubilize phosphate, the nif presence, their ability to produce indole-acetic acid (IAA) and verify their efficacy to promote plant growth in cowpea plants. Bacteria were isolated from rhizospheric soils, from surface- sterilized stems and roots of plants collected in Brazil, in nitrogen- free medium, and identified through fatty acid analysis. Gram-negative bacteria comprised 63% of endophytic bacteria and 80% of rhizobacteria. Only 13% showed amplification of nifH gene. From the 68 bacterial strains, associated with cacti, 18% produced IAA, and the best results were observed in Agrobacterium radiobacter, Klebsiella trevisanii, Enterobacter agglomeransand Paracoccus denitrificans. Phosphate solubilization was observed in 6% of strains. None of the strains inoculated in cowpea plants promoted stem and foliar growth. Four percent of strains showed ability to increase the root dry matter compared to the control group (inoculated with a pool of indigenous semi-arid Rhizobium). Key words: Endophytes, rhizosphere, indole-acetic acid (IAA), phosphate solubilization, cacti, Vigna. .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gram-negative bacteria comprised 63% of cactus endophytes.

Taxon
Opuntia ficus-indicaOpuntia ficus-indicat0
Outcome
endophytic bacteriae0
Value
63%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia ficus-indica
Opuntia ficus-indica · TaxonYG01 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gram-negative bacteria comprised 63% of endophytic bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia ficus-indica mill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gram-negative bacteria comprised 80% of cactus rhizobacteria.

Taxon
Opuntia ficus-indicaOpuntia ficus-indicat0
Outcome
rhizobacteriae0
Value
80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia ficus-indica
Opuntia ficus-indica · TaxonYG01 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“80% of rhizobacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–842 · show in text ↑
e1

“Gram-negative bacteria comprised”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 758–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia ficus-indica mill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only 13% of cactus-associated bacteria amplified nifH.

Taxon
Opuntia ficus-indicaOpuntia ficus-indicat0
Gene
nifHe0
Outcome
amplification of nifH genee0
Value
13%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia ficus-indica
Opuntia ficus-indica · TaxonYG01 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 13% showed amplification of nifH gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia ficus-indica mill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Eighteen percent of cactus-associated strains produced IAA.

Taxon
Opuntia ficus-indicaOpuntia ficus-indicat0
Outcome
produced IAAe0
Value
18%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia ficus-indica
Opuntia ficus-indica · TaxonYG01 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From the 68 bacterial strains, associated with cacti, 18% produced IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia ficus-indica mill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best IAA production results occurred in four named bacterial taxa.

Taxon
Opuntia ficus-indicaOpuntia ficus-indicat0
Outcome
produced IAAe1
Qualifier
Agrobacterium radiobacter, Klebsiella trevisanii, Enterobacter agglomeransand Paracoccus denitrificanse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia ficus-indica
Opuntia ficus-indica · TaxonYG01 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best results were observed in Agrobacterium radiobacter, Klebsiella trevisanii, Enterobacter agglomeransand Paracoccus denitrificans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1100 · show in text ↑
e1

“produced IAA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia ficus-indica mill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six percent of cactus-associated strains solubilized phosphate.

Taxon
Opuntia ficus-indicaOpuntia ficus-indicat0
Outcome
Phosphate solubilizatione0
Value
6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Opuntia ficus-indica
Opuntia ficus-indica · TaxonYG01 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphate solubilization was observed in 6% of strains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1156 · show in text ↑
t0

“Opuntia ficus-indica mill”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

None of the inoculated strains promoted cowpea stem or foliage growth.

Treatment
strains inoculatede0
Outcome
stem and foliar growthe0
Direction
Nonee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“None of the strains inoculated in cowpea plants promoted stem and foliar growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1237 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four percent of strains increased cowpea root dry matter relative to the indigenous Rhizobium control.

Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
strainse0
Outcome
root dry mattere0
Direction
increasee0
Value
Four percente0
Comparator
control groupe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four percent of strains showed ability to increase the root dry matter compared to the control group (inoculated with a pool of indigenous semi-arid Rhizobium)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1398 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑

inoculation · growth · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

102 papers: 92 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 92 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.