Paper · 2013 · Acta Horticulturae

POST-VERAISON MECHANICAL LEAF REMOVAL DELAYS BERRY RIPENING ON 'SANGIOVESE' AND 'MONTEPULCIANO' GRAPEVINES

V. Lanari; T. Lattanzi; L. Borghesi; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ripe berries often results too rich in sugar in recent years, though harvest is done in advance, thus the hypothesis of limiting berry sugar accumulation by lowering canopy carbon assimilation during ripening phase was tested in 2011 season. Post-veraison removal of the most functional leaves on the upper part of the canopy of vertical shoot positioned medium-vigour 'Sangiovese' and 'Montepulciano' grapevines was performed mechanically in a hillside vineyard established in 2006 nearby Ancona, Central Italy. Grapevines, 2.75x1.2 m spaced, were cordon trained and spur pruned. The tractor-mounted Plucker leaf stripper (Tanesini Technology, Faenza, Italy) operated on both side of the canopy on August 26, 2011 (i.e. 28 days after veraison and 34 days before harvest), when berry sugar concentration was already at 22°Brix and total acidity was still around 9-10 g/L. The leaf stripper removed from the upper part of the canopy (0.7-1.0 m above the cordon) 60 and 29% of the leaf area in 'Sangiovese' and 'Montepulciano' respectively. As a consequence, total leaf area per vine lowered by 25% in 'Sangiovese' and 14% in 'Montepulciano'. Leaf/fruit ratio at harvest lowered from 1.18 to 0.73 m2/kg in 'Sangiovese' and from 1.23 to 1.03 m2/kg in 'Montepulciano'. The significant reduction of total leaf area registered in post-veraison defoliated grapevines of both cultivars did not affect yield per vine, bunch and berry weight, total acidity and pH of the must, but lowered juice soluble solids concentration (-0.7°Brix in comparison to control in both cultivars). Post-veraison defoliation negatively affected anthocyanins and polyphenols concentration at harvest in 'Montepulciano' grapevines, but not in 'Sangiovese' ones. Thus mechanical leaf removal, quick and easy to perform late in the season to obtain grapes less rich in sugar, may be detrimental to berry colour according to genotype and should be carefully tested on black-berried cultivars before large scale application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf stripping removed 60% of upper canopy leaf area in Sangiovese.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
'Sangiovese'e0
Treatment
leaf strippere0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
removede0
Value
60 and 29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf stripper removed from the upper part of the canopy (0.7-1.0 m above the cordon) 60 and 29% of the leaf area in 'Sangiovese' and 'Montepulciano' respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf stripping removed 29% of upper canopy leaf area in Montepulciano.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
'Montepulciano'e0
Treatment
leaf strippere0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
removede0
Value
29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf stripper removed from the upper part of the canopy (0.7-1.0 m above the cordon) 60 and 29% of the leaf area in 'Sangiovese' and 'Montepulciano' respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–1038 · show in text ↑
t0

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf area per vine fell 25% in Sangiovese.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
'Sangiovese'e0
Treatment
defoliatede1
Outcome
total leaf area per vinee0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
25%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total leaf area per vine lowered by 25% in 'Sangiovese' and 14% in 'Montepulciano'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf area per vine fell 14% in Montepulciano.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
'Montepulciano'e0
Treatment
defoliatede1
Outcome
total leaf area per vinee0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
14%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total leaf area per vine lowered by 25% in 'Sangiovese' and 14% in 'Montepulciano'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf to fruit ratio fell from 1.18 to 0.73 m2/kg in Sangiovese.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
'Sangiovese'e0
Treatment
defoliatede1
Outcome
Leaf/fruit ratioe0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
0.73 m2/kge0
Qualifier
1.18e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf/fruit ratio at harvest lowered from 1.18 to 0.73 m2/kg in 'Sangiovese' and from 1.23 to 1.03 m2/kg in 'Montepulciano'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf to fruit ratio fell from 1.23 to 1.03 m2/kg in Montepulciano.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Material
'Montepulciano'e0
Treatment
defoliatede1
Outcome
Leaf/fruit ratioe0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
1.03 m2/kge0
Qualifier
1.23e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf/fruit ratio at harvest lowered from 1.18 to 0.73 m2/kg in 'Sangiovese' and from 1.23 to 1.03 m2/kg in 'Montepulciano'.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation did not affect yield per vine, bunch or berry weight in either cultivar.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
defoliatede1
Outcome
yield per vine, bunch and berry weighte0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not affect yield per vine, bunch and berry weight, total acidity and pH of the must”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1465 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation did not affect must total acidity or pH in either cultivar.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
defoliatede1
Outcome
total acidity and pH of the muste0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“did not affect yield per vine, bunch and berry weight, total acidity and pH of the must”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1378–1465 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation lowered juice soluble solids by 0.7°Brix versus control in both cultivars.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise1
Treatment
defoliatede1
Outcome
juice soluble solids concentratione0
Direction
lowerede0
Value
-0.7°Brixe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lowered juice soluble solids concentration (-0.7°Brix in comparison to control in both cultivars).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1569 · show in text ↑
e1

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation reduced anthocyanins concentration in Montepulciano at harvest.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
'Montepulciano'e0
Treatment
Post-veraison defoliatione0
Outcome
anthocyaninse0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-veraison defoliation negatively affected anthocyanins and polyphenols concentration at harvest in 'Montepulciano' grapevines, but not in 'Sangiovese' ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation reduced polyphenols concentration in Montepulciano at harvest.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
'Montepulciano'e0
Treatment
Post-veraison defoliatione0
Outcome
polyphenols concentratione0
Direction
negatively affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-veraison defoliation negatively affected anthocyanins and polyphenols concentration at harvest in 'Montepulciano' grapevines, but not in 'Sangiovese' ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1730 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defoliation did not reduce anthocyanin or polyphenol concentration in Sangiovese.

Taxon
grapevinesVitise0
Material
'Sangiovese'e0
Treatment
Post-veraison defoliatione0
Outcome
anthocyanins and polyphenols concentratione0
Direction
but note0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Post-veraison defoliation negatively affected anthocyanins and polyphenols concentration at harvest in 'Montepulciano' grapevines, but not in 'Sangiovese' ones.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1730 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend testing late mechanical leaf removal on black-berried cultivars before large scale application because berry colour may suffer.

Taxon
grapevinesVitist0
Outcome
carefully tested on black-berried cultivars before large scale applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“may be detrimental to berry colour according to genotype and should be carefully tested on black-berried cultivars before large scale application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1843–1989 · show in text ↑
t0

“post-veraison defoliated grapevines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1359 · show in text ↑

pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

61 papers: 41 positive, 20 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

pruning · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 30 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

107 papers: 71 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.