Paper · 2014 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Girdling, Gibberellic Acid, and Forchlorfenuron: Effects on Yield, Quality, and Metabolic Profile of Table Grape cv. Italia

Giuseppe Ferrara; Andrea Mazzeo; Giuseppe Netti; et al.

8
claims
19
verbatim quotes
57
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Among the various vineyard treatments adopted in recent years for table-grape cultivation, there has been a significant use of plant growth regulators (PGRs) and girdling to increase berry size and yield. In particular, an increase in the application of forchlorfenuron (CPPU) and gibberellic acid (GA3) for many seeded and seedless table-grape cultivars has been registered in several countries. In this two-year study, girdling at berry set, gibberellic acid (10 mg/L) applied at berry diameter of 10 to 11 mm, and forchlorfenuron (9.75 mg/L) applied at berry diameter of 11 to 12 mm were investigated to verify their effects on berry size, yield, and chemical and metabolic characteristics of Italia grapes. In general, at harvest all treatments significantly increased berry diameter, length, and weight and consequent cluster weight and yield/vine compared to an untreated control. The treatments showed significant differences for the colorimetric parameters, in particular a higher value of hue for berries treated with GA3 and CPPU, thus shifting the skin color from yellow toward yellow-green. Metabolomic study carried out by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy combined with principal component analysis indicated that metabolic profile depends on the year and, in each year, the effect of treatments consisted of a slight variation of amino acid content. Treatments effects were more pronounced in the year characterized by a cooler summer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Girdling significantly increased berry size, cluster weight and yield per vine versus untreated control.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Material
Italiat0
Treatment
girdling at berry sete0
Outcome
berry diameter, length, and weight and consequent cluster weight and yield/vinee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Verbatim

t0

“Table Grape cv. Italia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“girdling at berry set”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 421–442 · show in text ↑
e1

“all treatments significantly increased berry diameter, length, and weight and consequent cluster weight and yield/vine compared to an untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellic acid significantly increased berry size, cluster weight and yield per vine versus untreated control.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Material
Italiat0
Treatment
gibberellic acid (10 mg/L)e0
Outcome
berry diameter, length, and weight and consequent cluster weight and yield/vinee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Verbatim

t0

“Table Grape cv. Italia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“gibberellic acid (10 mg/L) applied at berry diameter of 10 to 11 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–511 · show in text ↑
e1

“all treatments significantly increased berry diameter, length, and weight and consequent cluster weight and yield/vine compared to an untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Forchlorfenuron significantly increased berry size, cluster weight and yield per vine versus untreated control.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Material
Italiat0
Treatment
forchlorfenuron (9.75 mg/L)e0
Outcome
berry diameter, length, and weight and consequent cluster weight and yield/vinee1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
untreated controle1

Verbatim

t0

“Table Grape cv. Italia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“forchlorfenuron (9.75 mg/L) applied at berry diameter of 11 to 12 mm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–585 · show in text ↑
e1

“all treatments significantly increased berry diameter, length, and weight and consequent cluster weight and yield/vine compared to an untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–885 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 produced higher berry hue and shifted skin color toward yellow-green.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Material
Italiat0
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
huee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
shifting the skin color from yellow toward yellow-greene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Table Grape cv. Italia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“a higher value of hue for berries treated with GA3 and CPPU, thus shifting the skin color from yellow toward yellow-green”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1101 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CPPU produced higher berry hue and shifted skin color toward yellow-green.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Material
Italiat0
Treatment
CPPUe0
Outcome
huee0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
shifting the skin color from yellow toward yellow-greene0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Table Grape cv. Italia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“a higher value of hue for berries treated with GA3 and CPPU, thus shifting the skin color from yellow toward yellow-green”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1101 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape metabolic profile depended on year.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Material
Italiat0
Outcome
metabolic profilee0
Qualifier
yeare0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Table Grape cv. Italia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“metabolic profile depends on the year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments caused slight variation in grape amino acid content each year.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Material
Italiat0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
amino acid contente0
Qualifier
slight variatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Table Grape cv. Italia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“in each year, the effect of treatments consisted of a slight variation of amino acid content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1369 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment effects were more pronounced in the cooler-summer year.

Taxon
Table Grapet0
Material
Italiat0
Outcome
Treatments effectse0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Setting
year characterized by a cooler summere0

Verbatim

t0

“Table Grape cv. Italia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Treatments effects were more pronounced in the year characterized by a cooler summer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1456 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · VitisResults differ

47 papers: 39 positive, 8 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

forchlorfenuron · yield · VitisResults agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

pruning · yield · VitisPositive and negative results

107 papers: 71 positive, 36 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.