Paper · 2019 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Arbuscular mycorrhizal isolate and phosphogypsum effects on growth and nutrients acquisition of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

Ibrahim, M.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-sa

Abstract

Cotton was grown in pots with added phosphogypsum (PG) to evaluate the effect of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and phosphogypsum on cotton growth and acquisition of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), manganese (Mn), iron (Fe), copper (Cu), and zinc (Zn). AMF isolate was a mixture of Glomus intraradices, Glomus viscosum, and Glomus mosseae previously isolated from a cotton field. Shoot dry biomass was enhanced significantly by both indigenous AMF and PG. Shoot dry biomass and seed cotton yields were enhanced by the AMF and PG combination and even more when PG in compost was added to mycorrhizal plants. P content in AMF with PG and in AMF with PG/compost treated plants was, respectively, 209.3 and 278.7%, significantly higher than control. Acquisition of K, Ca, and micronutrients was significantly enhanced by the combination of AMF and PG. The treatment of AMF with PG/compost induced the highest contents in Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn which were found to be, respectively, 287, 201, 192.8, and 171% higher compared to control. Results indicate that cotton growth responded to indigenous AMF in soils amended with PG. Combination of AMF with PG added in compost can ensure satisfactory benefits for cotton growth in low input, sustainable cropping systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

indigenous AMF significantly enhanced cotton shoot dry biomass.

Treatment
indigenous AMFe0
Outcome
Shoot dry biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry biomass was enhanced significantly by both indigenous AMF and PG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PG significantly enhanced cotton shoot dry biomass.

Treatment
PGe0
Outcome
Shoot dry biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry biomass was enhanced significantly by both indigenous AMF and PG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF and PG combination enhanced cotton Shoot dry biomass.

Treatment
AMF and PG combinatione0
Outcome
Shoot dry biomasse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry biomass and seed cotton yields were enhanced by the AMF and PG combination and even more when PG in compost was added to mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF and PG combination enhanced cotton seed cotton yields.

Treatment
AMF and PG combinatione0
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry biomass and seed cotton yields were enhanced by the AMF and PG combination and even more when PG in compost was added to mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PG in compost enhanced cotton Shoot dry biomass.

Treatment
PG in composte0
Outcome
Shoot dry biomasse0
Direction
even moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry biomass and seed cotton yields were enhanced by the AMF and PG combination and even more when PG in compost was added to mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PG in compost enhanced cotton seed cotton yields.

Treatment
PG in composte0
Outcome
seed cotton yieldse0
Direction
even moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot dry biomass and seed cotton yields were enhanced by the AMF and PG combination and even more when PG in compost was added to mycorrhizal plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–634 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF with PG raised cotton P content 209.3 above control.

Treatment
AMF with PGe0
Outcome
P contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
209.3e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P content in AMF with PG and in AMF with PG/compost treated plants was, respectively, 209.3 and 278.7%, significantly higher than control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF with PG/compost raised cotton P content 278.7% above control.

Treatment
AMF with PG/composte0
Outcome
P contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
278.7%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P content in AMF with PG and in AMF with PG/compost treated plants was, respectively, 209.3 and 278.7%, significantly higher than control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–773 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF with PG significantly enhanced cotton acquisition of K, Ca, and micronutrients.

Treatment
combination of AMF and PGe0
Outcome
Acquisition of K, Ca, and micronutrientse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acquisition of K, Ca, and micronutrients was significantly enhanced by the combination of AMF and PG.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF with PG/compost raised cotton Mn content 287 above control.

Treatment
AMF with PG/composte0
Outcome
contents in Mne0
Direction
highere0
Value
287e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of AMF with PG/compost induced the highest contents in Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn which were found to be, respectively, 287, 201, 192.8, and 171% higher compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF with PG/compost raised cotton Fe content 201 above control.

Treatment
AMF with PG/composte0
Outcome
Mn, Fe, Cu and Zne0
Direction
highere0
Value
201e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of AMF with PG/compost induced the highest contents in Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn which were found to be, respectively, 287, 201, 192.8, and 171% higher compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF with PG/compost raised cotton Cu content 192.8 above control.

Treatment
AMF with PG/composte0
Outcome
Mn, Fe, Cu and Zne0
Direction
highere0
Value
192.8e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of AMF with PG/compost induced the highest contents in Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn which were found to be, respectively, 287, 201, 192.8, and 171% higher compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF with PG/compost raised cotton Zn content 171% above control.

Treatment
AMF with PG/composte0
Outcome
Mn, Fe, Cu and Zne0
Direction
highere0
Value
171%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment of AMF with PG/compost induced the highest contents in Mn, Fe, Cu and Zn which were found to be, respectively, 287, 201, 192.8, and 171% higher compared to control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that AMF with PG in compost can benefit cotton growth in low input cropping systems.

Outcome
Combination of AMF with PG added in compost can ensure satisfactory benefits for cotton growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combination of AMF with PG added in compost can ensure satisfactory benefits for cotton growth in low input, sustainable cropping systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1283 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–126 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

fertilization · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 497 positive, 53 negative or no effect

496 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

mycorrhiza · molecular: metabolites · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.