Paper · 2017 · Journal of Phytopathology

Apple Replant Disorder of Pingyitiancha Rootstock is Closely Associated with Rhizosphere Fungal Community Development

Jian Sun; Qiang Zhang; Xingliang Li; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
17
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to examine rhizosphere fungal community development in apple replant soil and a new planting soil in Beijing through a potted experiment with the apomictic triploid Pingyitiancha rootstock using the Illumina Miseq method. Steam sterilization significantly enhanced seedling growth in replant soil, while root segment addition did not enhance replant disease symptoms. The bulk soil of the replant site (ReSoil) and the new soil of the planting site (NewSoil) were sampled prior to nursery planting, and rhizosphere soils were r Qinping esampled after one growing season as RePlant and NewPlant, respectively. Approximately 48.3, 47.9, 59.8 and 68.8% of the operational taxonomic units ( OTU s) were classified as Ascomycota and Basidiomycota in the community of ReSoil, New Soil, RePlant and NewPlant, respectively. Shannon indices suggested that planting apple nurseries increased the fungal diversity of rhizosphere soil in both soils. Apple replant disorder ( ARD ) was highly associated with an unbalanced microbial ecosystem with more saprophytic and pathogenic fungi, but less species known to produce antimicrobial metabolites, while Rhizopus, Pyrenochaeta and Eurotium were identified as the key factors in ARD .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Steam sterilization enhanced apple seedling growth in replant soil.

Treatment
Steam sterilizatione0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
enhancede0
Setting
replant soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Steam sterilization significantly enhanced seedling growth in replant soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 257–331 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root segment addition did not enhance replant disease symptoms.

Treatment
root segment additione0
Outcome
replant disease symptomse0
Direction
did not enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root segment addition did not enhance replant disease symptoms”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–401 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting apple nurseries increased rhizosphere fungal diversity in both soils.

Treatment
planting apple nurseriese0
Outcome
fungal diversity of rhizosphere soile0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
both soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“planting apple nurseries increased the fungal diversity of rhizosphere soil in both soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple replant disorder was associated with an unbalanced fungal ecosystem.

Interactor
saprophytic and pathogenic fungie0pathogen
Outcome
Apple replant disorder ( ARD )e0
Qualifier
less species known to produce antimicrobial metabolitese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apple replant disorder ( ARD ) was highly associated with an unbalanced microbial ecosystem with more saprophytic and pathogenic fungi, but less species known to produce antimicrobial metabolites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizopus, Pyrenochaeta and Eurotium were identified as key factors in apple replant disorder.

Interactor
RhizopusRhizopuse0pathogen
Outcome
ARDe0
Qualifier
Pyrenochaeta and Eurotiume0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizopus
Rhizopus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryRamy algayar · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rhizopus, Pyrenochaeta and Eurotium were identified as the key factors in ARD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 · show in text ↑

solarization · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.