Paper · 2014

EFFECT OF METHODS OF RAISING SEEDLINGS ON GROWTH AND SEED YIELD OF CHILLI (CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.)

Darshan Gunaga; Basave Gowda; V. S. Salimath

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field investigation was carried out during Kharif, 2010-11 to study the effect of methods of raising seedlings on seed yield and quality of chilli Cv. Byadagi kaddi. The results revealed that plant height (95.67 cm), number of branch per plant (28.87), leaf area per plant (1528.31 dm 2 ), LAI (2.11), dry matter production (50.88 g plant -1 ), stem girth (2.05 cm), fruit length (12.60 cm), fruit girth (2.17 cm), number fruits per plant (49.53), hundred dry fruit weight (156.90 g), fruit yield per plant (191.31 g plant -1 ), fruit yield per hectare (17.84 q ha -1 ) of chilli was significantly higher in seedlings raised with polythene bag in shade house. Polythene bag under shade house recorded significantly higher seed yield per plant (19.31 g), seed yield (695.76 kg ha -1 ), test weight (6.43 g) than the other planting methods. Raised bed under shade recorded higher net returns (Rs. 1,93,669) and direct sowing recorded higher B:C ratio (3.60) over other treatment combinations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Polythene bag seedlings in a shade house had significantly higher plant height, branch count and leaf area.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
polythene bag in shade housee1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere1
Value
95.67 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“plant height (95.67 cm), number of branch per plant (28.87), leaf area per plant (1528.31 dm 2 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 194–290 · show in text ↑
e1

“of chilli was significantly higher in seedlings raised with polythene bag in shade house”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–660 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI (CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same method increased seed yield per plant to 19.31 g.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
Polythene bag under shade housee0
Outcome
seed yield per plante0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.31 ge0
Comparator
other planting methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“Polythene bag under shade house recorded significantly higher seed yield per plant (19.31 g), seed yield (695.76 kg ha -1 ), test weight (6.43 g) than the other planting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI (CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same method increased seed yield to 695.76 kg ha -1.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
Polythene bag under shade housee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
695.76 kg ha -1e0
Comparator
other planting methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“Polythene bag under shade house recorded significantly higher seed yield per plant (19.31 g), seed yield (695.76 kg ha -1 ), test weight (6.43 g) than the other planting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI (CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same method increased test weight to 6.43 g.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
Polythene bag under shade housee0
Outcome
test weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
6.43 ge0
Comparator
other planting methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“Polythene bag under shade house recorded significantly higher seed yield per plant (19.31 g), seed yield (695.76 kg ha -1 ), test weight (6.43 g) than the other planting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI (CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raised beds under shade gave higher net returns.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
Raised bed under shadee0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
highere0
Value
Rs. 1,93,669e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“Raised bed under shade recorded higher net returns (Rs. 1,93,669) and direct sowing recorded higher B:C ratio (3.60) over other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI (CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct sowing gave a higher B:C ratio.

Taxon
CHILLIt0
Treatment
direct sowinge0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.60e0
Comparator
other treatment combinationse0

Verbatim

e0

“direct sowing recorded higher B:C ratio (3.60) over other treatment combinations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“CHILLI (CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 · show in text ↑

poly(ethylene) · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

poly(ethylene) · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

shade · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Results differ

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

shade · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

transplanting · yield · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.