Paper · 2022 · agromix

Photosynthetic pigment content and growth of chili under low light intensity for agroforestry crop development

Zulfa Ulinnuha; Risqa Naila Khusna Syarifah

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Introduction: Plants that grow and develop in a shaded environment are difficult to produce optimally. Therefore, the use of plant species that are able to produce optimally in a shaded environment is very important to be used as an agroforestry area. The research purposes was to observe morpho-physiological characters that can be used as characters to determine chilli plants that can produced in low light intensity area. Methods: A field experiment was conducted at farmer field in Pekuncen, Banyumas, Indonesia from May to October 2020. The research was arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. The first plot was shading intensity (0% (control) and 50%) and the second plot consisted of nine chilli varieties, V1 (Segana), V2 (Lada Hijau), V3 (Bara), V4 (Catas),V5 (Kerinci), V6 (Raya), V7 (Genie), V8 (Sonar), and V9 (Rajo). Results: The results of this research showed that shade affected on leaves number and leaves area, but not affected on plant height and stem diameter. Shading net was affected on chlorophyll a and b, but not affected on chlorophyll content. Decreasing of total chlorophyll on 50% shade net occurring in shade sensitive varieties was significantly different than shade-tolerant varieties. Tolerant varieties based on the observation criteria were Bara (V3), Genie (V7), and Sonar (V8). Conclusion: Leaf area and leaf pigment character can be used as a reference for determining the resistance of varieties to low light.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade affected leaf number and leaf area of chili.

Taxon
chilit0
Treatment
shadee1
Outcome
leaves number and leaves areae1
Setting
farmer field in Pekuncen, Banyumas, Indonesiae6

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic pigment content and growth of chili under low light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results of this research showed that shade affected on leaves number and leaves area, but not affected on plant height and stem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1018 · show in text ↑
e6

“A field experiment was conducted at farmer field in Pekuncen, Banyumas, Indonesia from May to October 2020”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 435–541 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade did not affect plant height and stem diameter of chili.

Taxon
chilit0
Treatment
shadee1
Outcome
plant height and stem diametere1
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic pigment content and growth of chili under low light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results of this research showed that shade affected on leaves number and leaves area, but not affected on plant height and stem diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading net affected chlorophyll a and b of chili.

Taxon
chilit0
Treatment
Shading nete2
Outcome
chlorophyll a and be2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic pigment content and growth of chili under low light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shading net was affected on chlorophyll a and b, but not affected on chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading net did not affect total chlorophyll content of chili.

Taxon
chilit0
Treatment
Shading nete2
Outcome
chlorophyll contente2
Direction
not affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic pigment content and growth of chili under low light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“Shading net was affected on chlorophyll a and b, but not affected on chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll decreased under 50% shade net in shade-sensitive chili varieties, significantly more than in shade-tolerant varieties.

Taxon
chilit0
Material
shade sensitive varietiese3
Treatment
50% shade nete3
Outcome
total chlorophylle3
Direction
Decreasinge3
Comparator
shade-tolerant varietiese3

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic pigment content and growth of chili under low light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“Decreasing of total chlorophyll on 50% shade net occurring in shade sensitive varieties was significantly different than shade-tolerant varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1255 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bara (V3), Genie (V7) and Sonar (V8) are the shade-tolerant chili varieties.

Taxon
chilit0
Material
Bara (V3), Genie (V7), and Sonar (V8)e4
Outcome
Tolerant varietiese4

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic pigment content and growth of chili under low light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e4

“Tolerant varieties based on the observation criteria were Bara (V3), Genie (V7), and Sonar (V8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1352 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf area and leaf pigment character can serve as a reference for judging chili variety resistance to low light.

Taxon
chilit0
Outcome
resistance of varieties to low lighte5

Verbatim

t0

“Photosynthetic pigment content and growth of chili under low light intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–76 · show in text ↑
e5

“Leaf area and leaf pigment character can be used as a reference for determining the resistance of varieties to low light”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1486 · show in text ↑

shade · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.