Paper · 2016 · IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science

Role of Garlic and Turmeric Extract in The Leaves Mineral Contents of Apple Trees

Mustafa E.A.Al-Hadethi; M. H. Sh. Al-Hamdany; AliS.T. AL-Dulaimi

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

of Al-Anbar-Abu Ghraib during 2015 and 2016 seasons in order to investigate the response of four years old Apple trees (CV.Anna) budded on seeding root stock to foliar application with turmeric extract at four levels0 (T 0 ), 1.5 g.L -1 (T 1.5 ), 3 g.L -1 (T 3 ) and 4.5 g.L -1 (T 4.5 ) and garlic extract at four levels, 0 (GA 0 ), 25ml.L -1 (GA 25 ), 50ml.L -1 (GA 50 ) and 100ml.L -1 (GA 100 ) and their interaction between them in leaves mineral content . Each treatment replicated three times with a factorial experiment using RCBD. The number of trees used was 48 trees. The results showed that the interaction between the garlic extract at 100ml .L -1 combined with turmeric extract at 4.5 g .L -1 (GA 100 T 3 )gave a high value of leavesnitrogen content at1.99 and 2.06%, potassium content at 2.09 and 2.13%,iron contentat 210.2 and 214.4ppm and high value of leaveszinc content at and zinc 23.54 and 25.53 ppmfor both seasons, respectively. The lowest value of these parameters was found in the control (GA 0 T 0 ) treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined garlic and turmeric extracts gave high apple leaf nitrogen content of 1.99 and 2.06% in the two seasons.

Taxon
Apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
garlic extract at 100ml .L -1 combined with turmeric extract at 4.5 g .L -1e0
Outcome
leavesnitrogen contente0
Direction
high valuee0
Value
1.99 and 2.06%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic extract at 100ml .L -1 combined with turmeric extract at 4.5 g .L -1 (GA 100 T 3 )gave a high value of leavesnitrogen content at1.99 and 2.06%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined extracts gave high leaf potassium content of 2.09 and 2.13%.

Taxon
Apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
garlic extract at 100ml .L -1 combined with turmeric extract at 4.5 g .L -1e0
Outcome
potassium contente0
Direction
high valuee0
Value
2.09 and 2.13%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic extract at 100ml .L -1 combined with turmeric extract at 4.5 g .L -1 (GA 100 T 3 )gave a high value of leavesnitrogen content at1.99 and 2.06%, potassium content at 2.09 and 2.13%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined extracts gave high leaf iron content of 210.2 and 214.4ppm.

Taxon
Apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
garlic extract at 100ml .L -1 combined with turmeric extract at 4.5 g .L -1e0
Outcome
iron contente0
Direction
high valuee0
Value
210.2 and 214.4ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic extract at 100ml .L -1 combined with turmeric extract at 4.5 g .L -1 (GA 100 T 3 )gave a high value of leavesnitrogen content at1.99 and 2.06%, potassium content at 2.09 and 2.13%,iron contentat 210.2 and 214.4ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–849 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined extracts gave high leaf zinc content of 23.54 and 25.53 ppm.

Taxon
Apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
garlic extract at 100ml .L -1 combined with turmeric extract at 4.5 g .L -1e0
Outcome
leaveszinc contente0
Direction
high valuee0
Value
23.54 and 25.53 ppme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“garlic extract at 100ml .L -1 combined with turmeric extract at 4.5 g .L -1 (GA 100 T 3 )gave a high value of leavesnitrogen content at1.99 and 2.06%, potassium content at 2.09 and 2.13%,iron contentat 210.2 and 214.4ppm and high value of leaveszinc content at and zinc 23.54 and 25.53 ppm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The untreated control had the lowest values for those four leaf minerals.

Taxon
Apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
control (GA 0 T 0 ) treatmente0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest value of these parameters was found in the control (GA 0 T 0 ) treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 70–81 · show in text ↑

Allium sativum · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.