Paper · 2019 · Coatings

Antifungal Starch–Gellan Edible Coatings with Thyme Essential Oil for the Postharvest Preservation of Apple and Persimmon

Mayra Sapper; Lluís Palou; María B. Pérez-Gago; et al.

8
claims
9
verbatim quotes
84
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Starch–gellan (80:20) coating formulations were applied to apples and persimmons to analyse their effectiveness controlling the weight loss, respiration rate, fruit firmness, and fungal decay during postharvest. Thyme essential oil (EO) was incorporated (0.25 and 0.5 g per g of polymer) directly or encapsulated in lecithin to enhance antifungal action. Coatings did not reduce weight loss or firmness changes in apples, but they prevented water loss in persimmons. In contrast, no significant effect of the coatings was observed on the respiration rates and the respiration quotient of persimmons, whereas the respiration rates and quotient was increased in apples. On the other hand, the coatings without lecithin reduced the incidence and severity of black spot caused by Alternaria alternata in persimmons, regardless of the content of essential oil. Likewise, these reduced the severity of gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea in apples. No positive effect of lecithin in coatings was observed on the postharvest quality and decay in either apples or persimmons, nor did EO exert antifungal action despite its proven effectiveness in in vitro tests.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coatings did not reduce apple weight loss or firmness change.

Treatment
Coatingse0
Outcome
weight loss or firmness changese0
Direction
did not reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Coatings did not reduce weight loss or firmness changes in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–420 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coatings prevented water loss in persimmons.

Taxon
persimmonsDiospyrose0
Outcome
water losse0
Direction
preventede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“they prevented water loss in persimmons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 426–465 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coatings had no significant effect on persimmon respiration rates and quotient.

Taxon
persimmonsDiospyrose0
Treatment
coatingse0
Outcome
respiration rates and the respiration quotiente0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant effect of the coatings was observed on the respiration rates and the respiration quotient of persimmons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–598 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coatings increased apple respiration rates and quotient.

Outcome
respiration rates and quotiente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the respiration rates and quotient was increased in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coatings without lecithin reduced black spot incidence and severity in persimmons regardless of essential oil content.

Taxon
persimmonsDiospyrose0
Treatment
coatings without lecithine0
Interactor
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae0pathogen
Outcome
incidence and severity of black spote0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
regardless of the content of essential oile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the coatings without lecithin reduced the incidence and severity of black spot caused by Alternaria alternata in persimmons, regardless of the content of essential oil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coatings without lecithin reduced gray mold severity in apples.

Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
severity of gray molde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these reduced the severity of gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea in apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–942 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lecithin in coatings had no positive effect on postharvest quality or decay in apples and persimmons.

Taxon
apples or persimmonsMalus domesticaDiospyrose0
Treatment
lecithin in coatingse0
Outcome
postharvest quality and decaye0
Direction
No positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No positive effect of lecithin in coatings was observed on the postharvest quality and decay in either apples or persimmons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1067 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Essential oil did not exert antifungal action in coated fruit.

Taxon
Apple and PersimmonMalus domesticaDiospyrost0
Treatment
EOe0
Outcome
antifungal actione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Diospyros
Diospyros · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAndrew Hankey · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor did EO exert antifungal action despite its proven effectiveness in in vitro tests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1154 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple and Persimmon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–121 · show in text ↑

lecithin · disease · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · molecular: metabolites · DiospyrosPositive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.