Paper · 2013 · The Journal of Indian Botanical Society

Effect of weed control cultural practices on Phalaris minor and other weeds in wheat field

Sanjeev Kumar; Abha Agarwal

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Ten weed species were observed at experimental site of wheat in Kargaina village, Bareilly U.P. to study the effect of weed control cultural practices on Phalaris minor and other weeds in wheat field. Experimental field was infested with 52.13% Phalaris minor. Results indicated that cultural treatment of two hand-weeding (30 & 60 DAS) proved to be superior to the rest of the treatments. Close row spacing (15cm) and higher seed rate (125kg/ha) treatments resulted in less population and dry weight of Phalaris minor and other weeds as compared to stale seed bed preparation treatment. Early sowing treatment has not been very effective in reducing the population and dry weight of Phalaris minor and other weeds in comparison to other cultural treatments. Maximum dry weight of crop was recorded under two hand-weeding (1.305kg/m2) treatments as compared to higher seed rate (1.164kg/m2), close row spacing (1.158kg/m2) and stale seed bed preparation (1.112 kg/m2) treatments. Weed control cultural practices indicate that better control of Phalaris minor and other weeds can give higher wheat yields and economic returns.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten weed species were observed at the wheat site.

Outcome
Ten weed speciese0

Not reportedMaterialInteractorInteractor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ten weed species were observed at experimental site of wheat in Kargaina village, Bareilly U.P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phalaris minor infested 52.13% of the field.

Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
Phalaris minore0
Value
52.13%e0

Not reportedMaterialTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experimental field was infested with 52.13% Phalaris minor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 201–259 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings were superior to other cultural treatments.

Treatment
two hand-weeding (30 & 60 DAS)e0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
the rest of the treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialInteractorInteractor roleValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two hand-weeding (30 & 60 DAS) proved to be superior to the rest of the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–388 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Close row spacing reduced Phalaris minor and other weed population and dry weight versus stale seed bed preparation.

Treatment
Close row spacing (15cm)e0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of Phalaris minor and other weedse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
stale seed bed preparation treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Close row spacing (15cm) and higher seed rate (125kg/ha) treatments resulted in less population and dry weight of Phalaris minor and other weeds as compared to stale seed bed preparation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seed rate reduced Phalaris minor and other weed population and dry weight versus stale seed bed preparation.

Treatment
higher seed rate (125kg/ha)e0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of Phalaris minor and other weedse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
stale seed bed preparation treatmente0

Not reportedMaterialValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Close row spacing (15cm) and higher seed rate (125kg/ha) treatments resulted in less population and dry weight of Phalaris minor and other weeds as compared to stale seed bed preparation treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 390–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing was not very effective at reducing weed population and dry weight compared with other practices.

Treatment
Early sowing treatmente0
Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
population and dry weight of Phalaris minor and other weedse0
Direction
not been very effectivee0
Comparator
other cultural treatmentse0

Not reportedMaterialValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early sowing treatment has not been very effective in reducing the population and dry weight of Phalaris minor and other weeds in comparison to other cultural treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–757 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two hand weedings produced maximum crop dry weight of 1.305kg/m2.

Treatment
two hand-weedinge0
Outcome
dry weight of crope0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
1.305kg/m2e0
Comparator
higher seed ratee0

Not reportedMaterialInteractorInteractor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Maximum dry weight of crop was recorded under two hand-weeding (1.305kg/m2) treatments as compared to higher seed rate (1.164kg/m2), close row spacing (1.158kg/m2) and stale seed bed preparation (1.112 kg/m2) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–978 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–84 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Better weed control can raise wheat yield and economic returns.

Interactor
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
higher wheat yields and economic returnse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialTreatmentComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“better control of Phalaris minor and other weeds can give higher wheat yields and economic returns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1124 · show in text ↑

sowing time · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 64 positive, 52 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

density · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.