Paper · 2003 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Integrated Effect of Planting Methods and Herbicides on Phalaris minor and Wheat

U. S. Walia; L. S. Brar; Seema Jand

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Investigations were carried out to study the integrated effect of planting methods and herbicides on growth and development of Phalaris minor in rice-wheat system. Flat sown wheat at 15 cm row spacing resulted in significantly lower dry matter of P. minor as compared to bed planting method and to flat sown with 22.5 cm row spacing which on an average, increased grain yield by 12% as compared to bed sowing technique as well as flat sowing at 22.5 cm row spacing. Clodinafop and sulfosulfuron at their recommended levels efficiently controlled P. minor and increased grain yield of wheat as compared to unweeded (control). Application of clodinafop at 60 g ha−1 to flat sown closely spaced (15.0 cm) crop reduced the dry matter of P. minor to the extent of 16.7% as compared to bed planted crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flat sowing wheat at 15 cm reduced P. minor dry matter relative to bed planting and 22.5 cm flat sowing.

Treatment
Flat sown wheat at 15 cm row spacinge0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
dry matter of P. minore0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
bed planting method and to flat sown with 22.5 cm row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flat sown wheat at 15 cm row spacing resulted in significantly lower dry matter of P. minor as compared to bed planting method and to flat sown with 22.5 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–332 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flat sowing at 15 cm increased wheat grain yield by 12% relative to bed and 22.5 cm flat sowing.

Treatment
Flat sown wheat at 15 cm row spacinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
bed sowing technique as well as flat sowing at 22.5 cm row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flat sown wheat at 15 cm row spacing resulted in significantly lower dry matter of P. minor as compared to bed planting method and to flat sown with 22.5 cm row spacing which on an average, increased grain yield by 12% as compared to bed sowing technique as well as flat sowing at 22.5 cm row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 164–464 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop at its recommended level controlled P. minor compared with unweeded control.

Treatment
Clodinafope0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
P. minore0
Direction
controllede0
Comparator
unweeded (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop and sulfosulfuron at their recommended levels efficiently controlled P. minor and increased grain yield of wheat as compared to unweeded (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron at its recommended level controlled P. minor compared with unweeded control.

Treatment
sulfosulfurone0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
P. minore0
Direction
controllede0
Comparator
unweeded (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop and sulfosulfuron at their recommended levels efficiently controlled P. minor and increased grain yield of wheat as compared to unweeded (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop increased wheat grain yield relative to unweeded control.

Treatment
Clodinafope0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unweeded (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop and sulfosulfuron at their recommended levels efficiently controlled P. minor and increased grain yield of wheat as compared to unweeded (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfosulfuron increased wheat grain yield relative to unweeded control.

Treatment
sulfosulfurone0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unweeded (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Clodinafop and sulfosulfuron at their recommended levels efficiently controlled P. minor and increased grain yield of wheat as compared to unweeded (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–624 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop at 60 g ha−1 in closely spaced flat-sown wheat reduced P. minor dry matter by 16.7% relative to bed planting.

Taxon
crope0
Treatment
clodinafop at 60 g ha−1 to flat sown closely spaced (15.0 cm) crope0
Interactor
P. minorPhalaris minore0weed
Outcome
dry matter of P. minore0
Direction
reducede0
Value
16.7%e0
Comparator
bed planted crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of clodinafop at 60 g ha−1 to flat sown closely spaced (15.0 cm) crop reduced the dry matter of P. minor to the extent of 16.7% as compared to bed planted crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–797 · show in text ↑

clodinafop · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

density · Phalaris minor · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.