Paper · 2000 · PubMed

Effect of solvent residues of Vitex negundo Linn. and Cassia fistula Linn. on pulse beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. and its larval parasitoid, Dinarmus vagabundus (Timberlake).

N Raja; S Albert; S Ignacimuthu

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effect of solvent residues of Vitex negundo L. and Cassia fistula L. leaves (0.5 and 1%) was studied on egg laying and adult emergence of Callosobruchus maculatus Fab. and on percentage of larval parasitism by Dinarmus vagabundus (Timberlake). Cowpea seeds treated with methanol and aqueous extract of Vitex, at these concentrations (0.5 and 1%), significantly reduced the number of eggs and emergence of F1 adults of C. maculatus. Both Vitex and Cassia extracts did not affect the percentage of parasitism by D. vagabundus on C. maculatus grubs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea seeds treated with Vitex methanol and aqueous extracts at 0.5 and 1% significantly reduced egg numbers and F1 adult emergence of Callosobruchus maculatus.

Treatment
methanol and aqueous extract of Vitexe1
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse1pest
Outcome
number of eggs and emergence of F1 adultse1
Direction
reducede1
Qualifier
0.5 and 1%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Cowpea seeds treated with methanol and aqueous extract of Vitex, at these concentrations (0.5 and 1%), significantly reduced the number of eggs and emergence of F1 adults of C. maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 244–430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitex and Cassia extracts did not affect the percentage of parasitism by Dinarmus vagabundus on Callosobruchus maculatus grubs.

Taxon
Vitex and CassiaCassiaVitexe2
Treatment
Vitex and Cassia extractse2
Interactor
C. maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse2pest
Second interactor
D. vagabunduse2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
percentage of parasitisme2
Direction
did not affecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cassia
Cassia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Forest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vitex
Vitex · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Doronenko · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Both Vitex and Cassia extracts did not affect the percentage of parasitism by D. vagabundus on C. maculatus grubs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–545 · show in text ↑

methanol · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

163 papers: 158 positive, 5 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

159 papers more in this group

See all 163 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.