Paper · 2015

Effect of Zeolites on Soil Quality, Plant Growth and Nutrient Uptake Efficiency in Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas L.)

V. Ramesh; James George; Jissy S. Jyothi; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Zeolites (sodium alumino silicates) are effective controlled nutrient release materials that are highly useful to improve soil nutrient use efficiency, plant uptake of nutrients especially NPK because of its twin benefits of high cation exchange and water retention properties. In this paper, we evaluated different types of synthetic zeolites applications viz. fly ash based near neutral agricultural grade (FAZ) and commercial (CZ) zeolites (zeolite 4A) in tropical laterite soils with respect to soil chemical properties, soil water content, sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) as well as plant growth parameters and yield of sweet potato crop (variety ST-14) with an aim of understanding the effectiveness of zeolites on NPK uptake efficiency. A pot study was conducted in farm soils of CTCRI (acidic, sandy loam soils) using six treatments viz. FAZ applied at 1% and 2% levels (w/w, zeolite: soil) (denoted as F1 and F2), pH treated CZ at 1% level, potassium and zinc impregnated CZ (K-CZ and Zn-CZ) at 1% and a control (with out zeolites) each replicated thrice in a completely randomized design. Study showed that 1% zeolite amended soils registered a better soil moisture increase over control to an extent of 20.9 % and tuber yield increase of 57% over control. Soils amended with both FAZ levels are well below the critical limits in terms of SAR. The uptake efficiency of FAZ amended at 1% (F1) rate was significantly superior in respect of N and P as compared to F2 and control. The study also suggested that FAZ at 1% will be beneficial for sweet potato crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent zeolite raised soil moisture by 20.9% versus control.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
1% zeolitee0
Outcome
soil moisturee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
20.9 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1% zeolite amended soils registered a better soil moisture increase over control to an extent of 20.9 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1218 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One percent zeolite increased sweet potato tuber yield by 57% versus control.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
1% zeolitee0
Outcome
tuber yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
57%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1% zeolite amended soils registered a better soil moisture increase over control to an extent of 20.9 % and tuber yield increase of 57% over control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soils amended with both FAZ rates remained below critical SAR limits.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
both FAZ levelse0
Outcome
SARe0
Direction
below the critical limitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soils amended with both FAZ levels are well below the critical limits in terms of SAR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FAZ at 1% produced significantly superior nitrogen uptake efficiency to F2 and control.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
FAZ amended at 1% (F1) ratee0
Outcome
uptake efficiencye0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
Ne0
Comparator
F2 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake efficiency of FAZ amended at 1% (F1) rate was significantly superior in respect of N and P as compared to F2 and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

FAZ at 1% produced significantly superior phosphorus uptake efficiency to F2 and control.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
FAZ amended at 1% (F1) ratee0
Outcome
uptake efficiencye0
Direction
superiore0
Qualifier
Pe0
Comparator
F2 and controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The uptake efficiency of FAZ amended at 1% (F1) rate was significantly superior in respect of N and P as compared to F2 and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest FAZ at 1% for sweet potato.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatast0
Outcome
FAZ at 1% will be beneficiale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FAZ at 1% will be beneficial for sweet potato crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1565 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–95 · show in text ↑

other · soil: physics · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.