Paper · 2017 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

Effect of Humic Acid and Foliar Application of Different Potassium Sources on Yield, Quality and Water Use Efficiency of Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil

E. Abd- All, Ahmed; E. El-Namas, Ashraf; M. EL-Naggar, Essam

19
claims
35
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted at El-Bostan area at Aly Mubark experimental farm south Tahrir region, El Behira Governorate (300 54 N, 290 52 E, and 25 m above sea level), during 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 to study the effect of humic application with/without foliar application of different potassium source (potassium nitrate, potassium silicates, potassium humate, potassium sulphate) on sweet potato yield and quality characteristics under drip irrigation system. The results indicated that humic acid applications significantly increased the total tuber yield and all measured growth parameters of sweet potato. The relative increases of total tuber yield, marketable tuber yield, average tuber weight, tuber dry weight, foliage dry weight and leaf area were 6.64, 5.24, 7.47, 19.07, 4.35 and 7.92 %, respectively. Humic acid applications significantly increased total nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous content of sweet potato tubers. Also, foliar application of different potassium sources significantly increased total tuber yield of sweet potato and the most of quality characteristics. Potassium nitrate (KN) and potassium silicates treatments have the highest ability to increase the yield and other growth parameter than other potassium sources (potassium humate and potassium sulphate) under sandy soil condition. Interaction effects between humic acid and foliar application of different potassium sources indicated that there was a significant effect between soil application (fertigation) of humic acid and the foliar application of different potassium sources except for tuber potassium and phosphorus content and also, for available nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous in soil at harvest stage. Calculated water use efficiency (WUE) for total tuber yield increased with increasing rates of soil application of humic acid for the two growing season (2012/2013-2013/2014). Relative increases in WUE for total tuber yield were 4.46 and 11.65 % for HA2 and HA4, respectively as a mean value of the tow growing seasons. Also, WUE for marketable yield were more affected by soil application of humic acid compared to WUE for total yield, where the relative increases were 6.07 and 14.51 % for HA2 and HA4, respectively as a mean value of the tow growing seasons. Potassium silicate have the highest WUE for total tuber root yield values 3.76 ton/m3 followed by potassium nitrate 3.61 ton/m3 while potassium sulphate have the lowest WUE for total tuber root yield 3.20 ton/m3 as a mean values of the two growing season. It can be concluded that humic acid at rate of 4 kg/feddan with potassium silicate as a foliar application was good practice to increase sweet potato production under sandy soil condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased sweet potato total tuber yield by 6.64.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Humic Acidt0
Outcome
total tuber yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
6.64e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative increases of total tuber yield, marketable tuber yield, average tuber weight, tuber dry weight, foliage dry weight and leaf area were 6.64, 5.24, 7.47, 19.07, 4.35 and 7.92 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Humic Acid and Foliar Application of Different Potassium Sources on Yield, Quality and Water Use Efficiency of Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased sweet potato marketable tuber yield by 5.24.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Humic Acidt0
Outcome
marketable tuber yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
5.24e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative increases of total tuber yield, marketable tuber yield, average tuber weight, tuber dry weight, foliage dry weight and leaf area were 6.64, 5.24, 7.47, 19.07, 4.35 and 7.92 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Humic Acid and Foliar Application of Different Potassium Sources on Yield, Quality and Water Use Efficiency of Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased sweet potato average tuber weight by 7.47.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Humic Acidt0
Outcome
average tuber weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
7.47e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative increases of total tuber yield, marketable tuber yield, average tuber weight, tuber dry weight, foliage dry weight and leaf area were 6.64, 5.24, 7.47, 19.07, 4.35 and 7.92 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Humic Acid and Foliar Application of Different Potassium Sources on Yield, Quality and Water Use Efficiency of Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased sweet potato tuber dry weight by 19.07.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Humic Acidt0
Outcome
tuber dry weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
19.07e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative increases of total tuber yield, marketable tuber yield, average tuber weight, tuber dry weight, foliage dry weight and leaf area were 6.64, 5.24, 7.47, 19.07, 4.35 and 7.92 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Humic Acid and Foliar Application of Different Potassium Sources on Yield, Quality and Water Use Efficiency of Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased sweet potato foliage dry weight by 4.35.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Humic Acidt0
Outcome
foliage dry weighte0
Direction
increasese0
Value
4.35e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative increases of total tuber yield, marketable tuber yield, average tuber weight, tuber dry weight, foliage dry weight and leaf area were 6.64, 5.24, 7.47, 19.07, 4.35 and 7.92 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Humic Acid and Foliar Application of Different Potassium Sources on Yield, Quality and Water Use Efficiency of Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased sweet potato leaf area by 7.92 %.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Humic Acidt0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
increasese0
Value
7.92 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relative increases of total tuber yield, marketable tuber yield, average tuber weight, tuber dry weight, foliage dry weight and leaf area were 6.64, 5.24, 7.47, 19.07, 4.35 and 7.92 %, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–822 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Humic Acid and Foliar Application of Different Potassium Sources on Yield, Quality and Water Use Efficiency of Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid increased tuber nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous content.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Organ / stage
tuberse0
Treatment
Humic acid applicationse0
Outcome
total nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Humic acid applications significantly increased total nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous content of sweet potato tubers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–944 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium sources increased sweet potato total tuber yield and most quality characteristics.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
foliar application of different potassium sourcese0
Outcome
total tuber yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, foliar application of different potassium sources significantly increased total tuber yield of sweet potato and the most of quality characteristics.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1099 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium nitrate increased yield and growth more than potassium humate and potassium sulphate.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Potassium nitratee0
Outcome
yield and other growth parametere0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
potassium humate and potassium sulphatee0
Setting
sandy soil conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium nitrate (KN) and potassium silicates treatments have the highest ability to increase the yield and other growth parameter than other potassium sources (potassium humate and potassium sulphate) under sandy soil condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

potassium silicates increased yield and growth more than potassium humate and potassium sulphate.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
potassium silicatese0
Outcome
yield and other growth parametere0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
potassium humate and potassium sulphatee0
Setting
sandy soil conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium nitrate (KN) and potassium silicates treatments have the highest ability to increase the yield and other growth parameter than other potassium sources (potassium humate and potassium sulphate) under sandy soil condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1330 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The humic acid and foliar potassium interaction had significant effects on measured outcomes except stated tuber nutrients and soil nutrients.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
soil application (fertigation) of humic acid and the foliar application of different potassium sourcese0
Outcome
significant effecte0
Qualifier
except for tuber potassium and phosphorus content and also, for available nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous in soil at harvest stagee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effects between humic acid and foliar application of different potassium sources indicated that there was a significant effect between soil application (fertigation) of humic acid and the foliar application of different potassium sources except for tuber potassium and phosphorus content and also, for available nitrogen, potassium and phosphorous in soil at harvest stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1716 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HA2 increased WUE for total tuber yield by 4.46.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
HA2e0
Outcome
WUE for total tuber yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
4.46e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative increases in WUE for total tuber yield were 4.46 and 11.65 % for HA2 and HA4, respectively as a mean value of the tow growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–2036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HA4 increased WUE for total tuber yield by 11.65 %.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
HA4e0
Outcome
WUE for total tuber yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
11.65 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative increases in WUE for total tuber yield were 4.46 and 11.65 % for HA2 and HA4, respectively as a mean value of the tow growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1893–2036 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HA2 increased WUE for marketable yield by 6.07.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
HA2e0
Outcome
WUE for marketable yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
6.07e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, WUE for marketable yield were more affected by soil application of humic acid compared to WUE for total yield, where the relative increases were 6.07 and 14.51 % for HA2 and HA4, respectively as a mean value of the tow growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HA4 increased WUE for marketable yield by 14.51 %.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
HA4e0
Outcome
WUE for marketable yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
14.51 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Also, WUE for marketable yield were more affected by soil application of humic acid compared to WUE for total yield, where the relative increases were 6.07 and 14.51 % for HA2 and HA4, respectively as a mean value of the tow growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2278 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–175 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium silicate produced WUE for total tuber root yield of 3.76 ton/m3.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
Potassium silicatee0
Outcome
WUE for total tuber root yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.76 ton/m3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium silicate have the highest WUE for total tuber root yield values 3.76 ton/m3 followed by potassium nitrate 3.61 ton/m3 while potassium sulphate have the lowest WUE for total tuber root yield 3.20 ton/m3 as a mean values of the two growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2279–2534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–175 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

potassium nitrate produced WUE for total tuber root yield of 3.61 ton/m3.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
potassium nitratee0
Outcome
WUE for total tuber root yielde0
Direction
followed bye0
Value
3.61 ton/m3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium silicate have the highest WUE for total tuber root yield values 3.76 ton/m3 followed by potassium nitrate 3.61 ton/m3 while potassium sulphate have the lowest WUE for total tuber root yield 3.20 ton/m3 as a mean values of the two growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2279–2534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–175 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

potassium sulphate produced WUE for total tuber root yield of 3.20 ton/m3.

Taxon
Sweet PotatoIpomoea batatast0
Treatment
potassium sulphatee0
Outcome
WUE for total tuber root yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
3.20 ton/m3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium silicate have the highest WUE for total tuber root yield values 3.76 ton/m3 followed by potassium nitrate 3.61 ton/m3 while potassium sulphate have the lowest WUE for total tuber root yield 3.20 ton/m3 as a mean values of the two growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2279–2534 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sweet Potato Grown under Drip Irrigation in Sandy Soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–175 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend humic acid at 4 kg/feddan with foliar potassium silicate to increase sweet potato production on sandy soil.

Taxon
sweet potatoIpomoea batatase0
Treatment
humic acid at rate of 4 kg/feddan with potassium silicate as a foliar applicatione0
Outcome
good practice to increase sweet potato productione0
Setting
sandy soil conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ipomoea batatas
Ipomoea batatas · TaxonEarth100 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It can be concluded that humic acid at rate of 4 kg/feddan with potassium silicate as a foliar application was good practice to increase sweet potato production under sandy soil condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2535–2723 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results differ

35 papers: 32 positive, 3 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

other · growth · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

application · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 21 positive, 3 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

other · yield · Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.