Paper · 1986 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds Primed in an Aerated Salt Solution

A.M. Haigh; E.W.R. Barlow; F.L. Milthorpe; et al.

17
claims
36
verbatim quotes
60
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Conditions for priming tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), carrot ( Daucus carota L.), and onion ( Allium cepa L.) seeds in solutions of K 3 PO 4 + KNO 3 and K 2 HPO 4 + KNO 3 were optimized in a series of laboratory and field experiments. When primed in K 3 PO 4 + KNO 3 (−1.6 MPa) for 7, 14, or 21 days at 15°, 20°, or 25°C, the percentage of emergence was unchanged in tomato, increased in carrot, and decreased in onion. Although there were some species differences, all priming treatments reduced time-spread and increased median rate of emergence. For this solution, priming at 15° for 14 days was optimal for all 3 species. Detailed experiments using optimized priming solutions in an aerated column for tomato (K 2 HPO 4 + KNO 3 , −1.0 MPa) and for carrots (K 3 PO 4 + KNO 3 , −1.5 MPa) demonstrated that 18 days was necessary to prime tomato seeds maximally by reducing the time-spread of germination from 73 to 12 hr. With carrots, the maximal response was obtained after 16 days of priming. For both species, continued gains in germination could be obtained from prolonged priming, although only at the expense of a reduced percentage of germination. Air-drying and storing of tomato and carrot seeds for up to 28 days had no effect on subsequent emergence in the field. Conversely, air-drying of onion seeds reduced the percentage of emergence and increased time-spread and rate of emergence. In contrast, salt-primed tomato seeds exhibited an increase in percentage and rate of emergence, and a decrease in time-spread of field emergence. Primed carrot seeds exhibited a faster rate of field emergence than those not primed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming in K3PO4 + KNO3 left tomato emergence percentage unchanged.

Treatment
K 3 PO 4 + KNO 3e1
Outcome
percentage of emergencee1
Direction
unchangede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“When primed in K 3 PO 4 + KNO 3 (−1.6 MPa) for 7, 14, or 21 days at 15°, 20°, or 25°C, the percentage of emergence was unchanged in tomato, increased in carrot, and decreased in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming in K3PO4 + KNO3 increased carrot emergence percentage.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae1
Treatment
K 3 PO 4 + KNO 3e1
Outcome
percentage of emergencee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“When primed in K 3 PO 4 + KNO 3 (−1.6 MPa) for 7, 14, or 21 days at 15°, 20°, or 25°C, the percentage of emergence was unchanged in tomato, increased in carrot, and decreased in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming in K3PO4 + KNO3 decreased onion emergence percentage.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
K 3 PO 4 + KNO 3e1
Outcome
percentage of emergencee1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“When primed in K 3 PO 4 + KNO 3 (−1.6 MPa) for 7, 14, or 21 days at 15°, 20°, or 25°C, the percentage of emergence was unchanged in tomato, increased in carrot, and decreased in onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 254–437 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All priming treatments reduced the time-spread of emergence.

Treatment
all priming treatmentse2
Outcome
time-spreade2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e2

“all priming treatments reduced time-spread and increased median rate of emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All priming treatments increased the median rate of emergence.

Treatment
all priming treatmentse2
Outcome
median rate of emergencee2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e2

“all priming treatments reduced time-spread and increased median rate of emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–566 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming at 15 degrees C for 14 days was optimal for all three species.

Treatment
priming at 15° for 14 dayse3
Outcome
optimale3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e3

“For this solution, priming at 15° for 14 days was optimal for all 3 species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Priming tomato seeds for 18 days was necessary to maximise priming, reducing time-spread of germination from 73 to 12 hr.

Treatment
18 dayse4
Outcome
time-spread of germinatione4
Direction
reducinge4
Value
from 73 to 12 hre4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“demonstrated that 18 days was necessary to prime tomato seeds maximally by reducing the time-spread of germination from 73 to 12 hr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–940 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximal priming response in carrot was reached after 16 days of priming.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae5
Outcome
maximal responsee5
Value
16 dayse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e5

“With carrots, the maximal response was obtained after 16 days of priming”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1014 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged priming gave continued gains in germination in tomato and carrot.

Treatment
prolonged priminge6
Outcome
gains in germinatione6
Direction
increaseinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“demonstrated that 18 days was necessary to prime tomato seeds maximally by reducing the time-spread of germination from 73 to 12 hr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–940 · show in text ↑
e6

“For both species, continued gains in germination could be obtained from prolonged priming, although only at the expense of a reduced percentage of germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prolonged priming reduced the percentage of germination in tomato and carrot.

Treatment
prolonged priminge6
Outcome
percentage of germinatione6
Direction
reducede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e4

“demonstrated that 18 days was necessary to prime tomato seeds maximally by reducing the time-spread of germination from 73 to 12 hr”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–940 · show in text ↑
e6

“For both species, continued gains in germination could be obtained from prolonged priming, although only at the expense of a reduced percentage of germination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air-drying and storing tomato seeds for up to 28 days had no effect on field emergence.

Treatment
Air-drying and storinge7
Outcome
subsequent emergencee7

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e7

“Air-drying and storing of tomato and carrot seeds for up to 28 days had no effect on subsequent emergence in the field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1176–1294 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air-drying of onion seeds reduced the percentage of emergence.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
air-drying of onion seedse1
Outcome
percentage of emergencee1
Direction
reducede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Conversely, air-drying of onion seeds reduced the percentage of emergence and increased time-spread and rate of emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air-drying of onion seeds increased the time-spread of emergence.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
air-drying of onion seedse1
Outcome
time-spreade1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Conversely, air-drying of onion seeds reduced the percentage of emergence and increased time-spread and rate of emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air-drying of onion seeds increased the rate of emergence.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
air-drying of onion seedse1
Outcome
rate of emergencee1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e1

“Conversely, air-drying of onion seeds reduced the percentage of emergence and increased time-spread and rate of emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1417 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-primed tomato seeds increased the percentage and rate of emergence.

Treatment
salt-primede2
Outcome
percentage and rate of emergencee2
Direction
increasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e2

“In contrast, salt-primed tomato seeds exhibited an increase in percentage and rate of emergence, and a decrease in time-spread of field emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt-primed tomato seeds decreased the time-spread of field emergence.

Treatment
salt-primede2
Outcome
time-spread of field emergencee2
Direction
decreasee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e2

“In contrast, salt-primed tomato seeds exhibited an increase in percentage and rate of emergence, and a decrease in time-spread of field emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1564 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primed carrot seeds had a faster rate of field emergence than unprimed seeds.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae3
Treatment
Primede3
Outcome
rate of field emergencee3
Direction
fastere3
Comparator
those not primede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Field Emergence of Tomato, Carrot, and Onion Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–50 · show in text ↑
e3

“Primed carrot seeds exhibited a faster rate of field emergence than those not primed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1650 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · Daucus carota (carrot)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 121 positive, 10 negative or no effect

120 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

salinity · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

300 papers: 39 positive, 261 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 261 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

296 papers more in this group

See all 300 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.