Paper · 2015 · OALib

Pepper and Onion Yield Estimate Parameters as Affected by Seed Treatment Options: In the Selected Districts of Central Rift Valley; Oromia Regional State of Ethiopia

M. Teshome-Abdissa; O. Feyissa-Begna; B. Abnet-Dereje

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Pepper and onion yield estimate parameters were conducted during off-season of 2011 using irrigation both at on-station and at on-farm of Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center and its surrounding districts of Adami Tulu, Dugda and Bora district of central rift valley by participating important influential actors (farmers, NGOs, DAs, district agricultural officers, etc.) from the inception to evaluate different seed treatment options that can favor onion and pepper yield estimate parameters. Bombey red and Marekofana of high yielding, disease tolerant, early maturing, market and farmer preferred varieties were used for the research by collecting from Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center. Data on performance of yield estimate parameters were evaluated until it was transferred to permanent field. The on-station data analysis result indicated that except root length and greenness of onion and seedling thickness and greenness of pepper, majority of yield estimate parameters were statistically (P < 0.05) significant while root length, shoot length and shoot height of onion on-farm were statistically (P < 0.05) non-significant. For on-station onion, hot water treatment supplemented with dressing the seed with half recommendation rate of apron-star resulted in the highest yield estimate parameters for most of the variables collected. Although there was an absence of consistent for all traits under analysis, sowing seed without any treatment resulted to the lowest count or measurement. But seed treated with mancozeb as per the recommendation gave the highest score or count for pepper except that of leaf number and greenness in which hot water treatment alone resulted in highest count. Even though yield estimate parameters don't totally reflect actual attainable yield at the end of harvesting, seedlings that were superior for those traits mostly reflect yield if different management options applied as per recommendation set for the crops. * Capacity building for scale up of evident based best practice in agricultural production in Ethiopia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

On-station, most yield estimate parameters differed significantly (P < 0.05) among seed treatment options, except onion root length and greenness and pepper seedling thickness and greenness.

Treatment
seed treatment optionse1
Outcome
yield estimate parameterse0
Setting
on-statione0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The on-station data analysis result indicated that except root length and greenness of onion and seedling thickness and greenness of pepper, majority of yield estimate parameters were statistically (P < 0.05) significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–1030 · show in text ↑
e1

“to evaluate different seed treatment options that can favor onion and pepper yield estimate parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

On-farm, root length, shoot length and shoot height of onion did not differ significantly (P < 0.05) among seed treatments.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
seed treatment optionse1
Outcome
root length, shoot length and shoot heighte0
Setting
on-farme0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root length, shoot length and shoot height of onion on-farm were statistically (P < 0.05) non-significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1142 · show in text ↑
e1

“to evaluate different seed treatment options that can favor onion and pepper yield estimate parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For on-station onion, hot water treatment plus seed dressing with half the recommended rate of apron-star gave the highest yield estimate parameters for most variables.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
hot water treatment supplemented with dressing the seed with half recommendation rate of apron-stare0
Outcome
yield estimate parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Setting
on-statione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For on-station onion, hot water treatment supplemented with dressing the seed with half recommendation rate of apron-star resulted in the highest yield estimate parameters for most of the variables collected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1144–1351 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing seed without any treatment gave the lowest count or measurement, although not consistently for all traits.

Treatment
sowing seed without any treatmente0
Outcome
count or measuremente0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“sowing seed without any treatment resulted to the lowest count or measurement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1505 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper seed treated with mancozeb as recommended gave the highest score or count.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
seed treated with mancozeb as per the recommendatione0
Outcome
score or counte0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“seed treated with mancozeb as per the recommendation gave the highest score or count for pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1606 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For pepper leaf number and greenness, hot water treatment alone gave the highest count.

Taxon
peppere0
Treatment
hot water treatment alonee1
Outcome
leaf number and greennesse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“gave the highest score or count for pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1564–1606 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf number and greenness in which hot water treatment alone resulted in highest count”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1622–1708 · show in text ↑

seed treatment · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

46 papers: 39 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

heat · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.