Paper · 1984 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Split-night Temperatures, Light, and Chlormequat on Growth and Carbohydrate Status of Pelargonium × hortorum

J. W. White; I. J. Warrington

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Seedlings (72 or 48 days old) of Pelargonium × hortorum cv. Red Elite were grown in 1 experiment from the 6th leaf stage in controlled-environment (CE) rooms at 4 temperatures, including 2 split-night (SN) regimes and at 3 daily-light integrals; in a 2nd experiment they were grown at 2 temperatures including one SN regime, at 3 daily-light integrals, and with and without chlormequat soil drench. Each of the 2 night-temperature periods were of equal duration in the SN regimes. Plants grown under the SN regimes were either similar in growth and reproductive development to plants grown under constant night conditions, where the temperature was the mean of the 2 SN temperatures, or were generally intermediate in growth and development to plants grown throughout the night at each of the 2 temperatures used in the SN regime. A daily mean temperature of 20°C compared to 16.8° or 18° reduced the time between the 6th leaf and macrobud visible stages by 8 days. Leaf starch and sugar levels decreased as mean daily temperatures increased, but increased as daily-light integrals increased. Drenches of (2-chloroethyl)-trimethylammonium chloride (chlormequat) applied at the 6th leaf stage limited plant height and leaf area without influencing flowering date.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split-night temperatures produced growth and reproductive development similar to mean constant-night temperatures or intermediate between constant temperatures.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorumt0
Material
Red Elitet1
Treatment
SN regimese0
Outcome
growth and reproductive developmente0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
constant night conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants grown under the SN regimes were either similar in growth and reproductive development to plants grown under constant night conditions, where the temperature was the mean of the 2 SN temperatures, or were generally intermediate in growth and development to plants grown throughout the night at each of the 2 temperatures used in the SN regime.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pelargonium × hortorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“Red Elite”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A mean temperature of 20°C shortened the interval from sixth leaf to visible macrobud by 8 days relative to 16.8° or 18°.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorumt0
Treatment
20°Ce0
Outcome
time between the 6th leaf and macrobud visible stagese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
8 dayse0
Comparator
16.8° or 18°e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A daily mean temperature of 20°C compared to 16.8° or 18° reduced the time between the 6th leaf and macrobud visible stages by 8 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–974 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pelargonium × hortorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf starch and sugar levels decreased with increasing mean daily temperatures.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorumt0
Organ / stage
Leafe0
Treatment
mean daily temperaturese0
Outcome
starch and sugar levelse0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf starch and sugar levels decreased as mean daily temperatures increased, but increased as daily-light integrals increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pelargonium × hortorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf starch and sugar levels increased with increasing daily-light integrals.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorumt0
Organ / stage
Leafe0
Treatment
daily-light integralse0
Outcome
starch and sugar levelse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf starch and sugar levels decreased as mean daily temperatures increased, but increased as daily-light integrals increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pelargonium × hortorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlormequat drench limited height and leaf area.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorumt0
Organ / stage
6th leaf stagee0
Treatment
chlormequate0
Outcome
plant height and leaf areae0
Direction
limitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drenches of (2-chloroethyl)-trimethylammonium chloride (chlormequat) applied at the 6th leaf stage limited plant height and leaf area without influencing flowering date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pelargonium × hortorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlormequat drench did not alter flowering date.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorumt0
Organ / stage
6th leaf stagee0
Treatment
chlormequate0
Outcome
flowering datee0
Direction
without influencinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drenches of (2-chloroethyl)-trimethylammonium chloride (chlormequat) applied at the 6th leaf stage limited plant height and leaf area without influencing flowering date.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pelargonium × hortorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–119 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · phenology · Pelargonium x hortorum (zonal geranium)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlormequat chloride · growth · Pelargonium x hortorum (zonal geranium)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.