Paper · 2015 · Journal of Hill Agriculture

Efficacy of chemical retardants on growth and flowering in potted zonal pelargonium

JS Wazir

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted under glasshouse conditions with completely randomized block design where growth and flowering responses of two cultivars of Pelargonium × hortorum were studied using spray treatments of chlormequat or chlorocholine chloride or cycocel (CCC @ 500, 1000, 1500 ppm) and ethephon (350, 600, 1000 ppm). CCC at 1000–1500 ppm was found most effective in producing desirable and presentable potted pelargoniums where 15% dwarfing effect on plant height reduction was obtained along with an early flowering of 10–12 days as compared to control. Ethephon at 600–1000 ppm resulted in maximum height retardation (18.31%) in plants with more number of side shoots and 50% more plant spread as compared to the control. All ethephon treated plants resulted in delayed flowering. Both growth retardants have beneficial implications in large scale commercial production of potted zonal pelargoniums where axillary branching can be achieved with ethephon followed by cycocel foliar sprays to retard plant height and advance flowering.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC at 1000–1500 ppm reduced plant height of potted pelargonium by 15% compared with control.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorume0
Treatment
CCC at 1000–1500 ppme1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
reductione1
Value
15%e1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars of Pelargonium × hortorum were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“CCC at 1000–1500 ppm was found most effective in producing desirable and presentable potted pelargoniums where 15% dwarfing effect on plant height reduction was obtained along with an early flowering of 10–12 days as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC at 1000–1500 ppm advanced flowering of potted pelargonium by 10–12 days compared with control.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorume0
Treatment
CCC at 1000–1500 ppme1
Outcome
floweringe1
Direction
earlye1
Value
10–12 dayse1
Comparator
controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars of Pelargonium × hortorum were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“CCC at 1000–1500 ppm was found most effective in producing desirable and presentable potted pelargoniums where 15% dwarfing effect on plant height reduction was obtained along with an early flowering of 10–12 days as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at 600–1000 ppm gave maximum plant height retardation of 18.31% compared with control.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorume0
Treatment
Ethephon at 600–1000 ppme2
Outcome
height retardatione2
Direction
maximume2
Value
18.31%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars of Pelargonium × hortorum were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ethephon at 600–1000 ppm resulted in maximum height retardation (18.31%) in plants with more number of side shoots and 50% more plant spread as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at 600–1000 ppm gave more side shoots on potted pelargonium than control.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorume0
Treatment
Ethephon at 600–1000 ppme2
Outcome
number of side shootse2
Direction
moree2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars of Pelargonium × hortorum were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ethephon at 600–1000 ppm resulted in maximum height retardation (18.31%) in plants with more number of side shoots and 50% more plant spread as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at 600–1000 ppm gave 50% more plant spread of potted pelargonium than control.

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorume0
Treatment
Ethephon at 600–1000 ppme2
Outcome
plant spreade2
Direction
moree2
Value
50%e2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars of Pelargonium × hortorum were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–191 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ethephon at 600–1000 ppm resulted in maximum height retardation (18.31%) in plants with more number of side shoots and 50% more plant spread as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All ethephon-treated pelargonium plants flowered later (delayed flowering).

Taxon
Pelargonium × hortorumPelargonium ×hortorume0
Treatment
ethephone3
Outcome
floweringe3
Direction
delayede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pelargonium x hortorum
Pelargonium ×hortorum · TaxonPhoto by David J. Stang · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two cultivars of Pelargonium × hortorum were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 139–191 · show in text ↑
e3

“All ethephon treated plants resulted in delayed flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–794 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon followed by cycocel foliar sprays can achieve axillary branching in potted zonal pelargonium while retarding height and advancing flowering.

Taxon
potted zonal pelargoniumse4
Outcome
ethephon followed by cycocel foliar sprayse4

Verbatim

e4

“Both growth retardants have beneficial implications in large scale commercial production of potted zonal pelargoniums where axillary branching can be achieved with ethephon followed by cycocel foliar sprays to retard plant height and advance flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–1047 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · phenology · Pelargonium x hortorum (zonal geranium)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlormequat chloride · phenology · Pelargonium x hortorum (zonal geranium)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Pelargonium x hortorum (zonal geranium)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

chlormequat chloride · growth · Pelargonium x hortorum (zonal geranium)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.