Paper · 2016 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Surface Application of Lime–Silicate–Phosphogypsum Mixtures for Improving Tropical Soil Properties and Irrigated Common Bean Yield

Carlos A.C. Crusciol; Angela C.C.A. Artigiani; Orivaldo Arf; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Soil acidity limits crop production in tropical regions. Soil amendments mixture can be a strategy to alleviate subsoil acidity. Subsoil profile acidity reduces common bean grain yield. The movement of surface‐applied lime to subsurface soil layers is slow, and, consequently, liming requires a long period of time to become effective. Thus, it is important to develop strategies to increase the efficiency of acidity amendments practices in order to improve the chemical properties of tropical acid soils in no‐till systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of applying mixtures of silicate, lime, and phosphogypsum to the soil surface in tropical no‐till systems on soil chemical properties and leaf nutrient concentrations, yield components, and grain yield of the common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.). A field experiment was performed during two growing seasons (2004 and 2005) in a field with Typic Acrustox soils. Among the treatments, the silicate–phosphogypsum mixture was more effective for ameliorating soil acidity at a depth of 0 to 0.20 m over a short period of time (6 mo). The application of soil amendments separately or in mixtures increased the soil pH to 0.40 m depth 18 mo after application. Combining the surface application of phosphogypsum with lime and/or silicate effectively increased the NO 3 − –N, SO 4 2− –S, and Ca 2+ levels at soil depths of up to 0.40 m over a relatively short period of time, resulting in a higher base saturation in the deepest layer evaluated (0.20–0.40 m). Compared with the control treatment, the mixtures of soil acidity amendments and phosphogypsum resulted in greater Ca, S, and Si concentrations in the leaves and increased the grain yield of the common bean by >22% over two growing seasons. Long‐term studies are required to establish the frequency of reapplication and the residual effects of soil amendment mixtures.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silicate–phosphogypsum was most effective at ameliorating soil acidity at 0 to 0.20 m within 6 months.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
silicate–phosphogypsum mixturee0
Outcome
soil aciditye0
Direction
more effectivee0
Value
6 moe0
Qualifier
0 to 0.20 me0
Comparator
Among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the treatments, the silicate–phosphogypsum mixture was more effective for ameliorating soil acidity at a depth of 0 to 0.20 m over a short period of time (6 mo).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Separate or mixed soil amendments increased soil pH to 0.40 m after 18 months.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
soil amendments separately or in mixturese0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
0.40 m depth 18 mo after applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of soil amendments separately or in mixtures increased the soil pH to 0.40 m depth 18 mo after application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphogypsum with lime and/or silicate increased soil nitrate N, sulfate S, and calcium levels to 0.40 m.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
surface application of phosphogypsum with lime and/or silicatee0
Outcome
NO 3 − –N, SO 4 2− –S, and Ca 2+ levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
soil depths of up to 0.40 me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining the surface application of phosphogypsum with lime and/or silicate effectively increased the NO 3 − –N, SO 4 2− –S, and Ca 2+ levels at soil depths of up to 0.40 m over a relatively short period of time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1452 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined amendment increased base saturation in the deepest evaluated soil layer.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
surface application of phosphogypsum with lime and/or silicatee0
Outcome
base saturatione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
0.20–0.40 me0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Combining the surface application of phosphogypsum with lime and/or silicate effectively increased the NO 3 − –N, SO 4 2− –S, and Ca 2+ levels at soil depths of up to 0.40 m over a relatively short period of time, resulting in a higher base saturation in the deepest layer evaluated (0.20–0.40 m).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1537 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendment mixtures increased bean leaf Ca, S, and Si concentrations compared with control.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
mixtures of soil acidity amendments and phosphogypsume0
Outcome
Ca, S, and Si concentrations in the leavese0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control treatment, the mixtures of soil acidity amendments and phosphogypsum resulted in greater Ca, S, and Si concentrations in the leaves and increased the grain yield of the common bean by >22% over two growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendment mixtures increased bean grain yield by more than 22% over two seasons.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarist0
Treatment
mixtures of soil acidity amendments and phosphogypsume0
Outcome
grain yield of the common beane0
Direction
increasede0
Value
>22%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the control treatment, the mixtures of soil acidity amendments and phosphogypsum resulted in greater Ca, S, and Si concentrations in the leaves and increased the grain yield of the common bean by >22% over two growing seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Common Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–124 · show in text ↑

silicate(4-) · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

ph · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

ph · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

lime · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.