Paper · 1991 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Productivity and Growth of Short-internode Muskmelon Plants at Various Spacings or Densities

Dean E. Knavel

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Short-internode (SI) muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) genotypes Ky-P 7 (si-1 gene for SI) and Main Dwarf (si-3 gene for SI) were compared with the normal-internode (NI) cultivar Mainstream at various plant spacings or planting densities over 3 years. SI `Honey Bush' (si-1 gene for SI) and `Bush Star' (si-1 gene for SI) were included in 2 years. At double the population, SI plants (si gene type) produced ≈35% fewer fruit than `Mainstream' plants grown at one-half the population density. Spacing generally had no effect on average fruit weight, but increasing plant density of SI genotypes decreased the number of fruit per plant. Generally, doubling the density reduced leaf area and total plant dry weight, but had minimal effect on the amount of shaded leaf area. Ky-P 7 , `Honey Bush', and `Bush Star' plants had more leaf shading than `Mainstream' and Main Dwarf plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At twice the population, short-internode plants produced about 35% fewer fruit than Mainstream at half the population.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
SI plantse0
Treatment
double the populatione0
Outcome
fruite0
Direction
fewere0
Value
≈35%e0
Comparator
`Mainstream' plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At double the population, SI plants (si gene type) produced ≈35% fewer fruit than `Mainstream' plants grown at one-half the population density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 342–484 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing generally did not affect average muskmelon fruit weight.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
Spacinge0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spacing generally had no effect on average fruit weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–541 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing density of short-internode genotypes decreased fruit number per plant.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
SI genotypese0
Treatment
increasing plant densitye0
Outcome
number of fruit per plante0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing plant density of SI genotypes decreased the number of fruit per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling density generally reduced muskmelon leaf area and total plant dry weight.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
doubling the densitye0
Outcome
leaf area and total plant dry weighte0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“doubling the density reduced leaf area and total plant dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling density had minimal effect on shaded muskmelon leaf area.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
doubling the densitye0
Outcome
amount of shaded leaf areae0
Direction
minimal effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“doubling the density reduced leaf area and total plant dry weight, but had minimal effect on the amount of shaded leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ky-P 7 had more leaf shading than Mainstream and Main Dwarf.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
Ky-P 7e0
Outcome
leaf shadinge0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
`Mainstream' and Main Dwarfe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ky-P 7 , `Honey Bush', and `Bush Star' plants had more leaf shading than `Mainstream' and Main Dwarf plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Honey Bush had more leaf shading than Mainstream and Main Dwarf.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
`Honey Bush'e0
Outcome
leaf shadinge0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
`Mainstream' and Main Dwarfe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ky-P 7 , `Honey Bush', and `Bush Star' plants had more leaf shading than `Mainstream' and Main Dwarf plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bush Star had more leaf shading than Mainstream and Main Dwarf.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis melot0
Material
`Bush Star'e0
Outcome
leaf shadinge0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
`Mainstream' and Main Dwarfe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ky-P 7 , `Honey Bush', and `Bush Star' plants had more leaf shading than `Mainstream' and Main Dwarf plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 765–872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Muskmelon Plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.