Paper · 2001 · HortScience

Spacing and Genotype Affect Fruit Sugar Concentration, Yield, and Fruit Size of Muskmelon

F. Kultur; H.C. Harrison; J.E. Staub

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
61
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) genotypes, Birdsnest 1 [`Qalya' (BN1)], Birdsnest 2 (BN2), and `Mission' (V) were used to determine the effects of differing plant architecture and spacing on fruit sugar concentration and yield. The BN1 and BN2 genotypes possessed a highly branched growth habit specific to birdsnest melon types, but not characteristic of standard indeterminate vining types (e.g., `Mission'). Experiments were conducted at both the Hancock and Arlington Experimental Farms in Wisconsin, where plant response to two within-row spacings [35 cm (72,600 plants/ha) and 70 cm (36,300 plants/ha)] in rows on 210-cm centers was examined. Genotypes were grown in a randomized complete-block design with four replications at each location and evaluated for primary lateral branch number, fruit number per plant and per hectare, average fruit weight, yield per plant (g), yield per hectare (t), and fruit sugar concentration. Yield, fruit number, and sugar concentration were higher for all genotypes at Arlington than at Hancock. The main effect of genotype was significant for all traits examined. Genotypes BN1 and V had higher mean fruit weight, yield per plant and per hectare, and fruit quality (fruit sugar concentration) than did BN2. Spacing affected all traits, except primary branch number and fruit sugar concentration. Fruit number and yield per plant and average fruit weight were higher with wider spacing, but yield (t·ha -1 ) and fruit number per hectare were lower.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BN1 and BN2 had highly branched birdsnest growth habits unlike standard vining types.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis meloe0
Material
BN1 and BN2e1
Outcome
highly branched growth habite1
Comparator
standard indeterminate vining typese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“The BN1 and BN2 genotypes possessed a highly branched growth habit specific to birdsnest melon types, but not characteristic of standard indeterminate vining types (e.g., `Mission').”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–407 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield and fruit number were higher at Arlington than Hancock.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis meloe0
Outcome
Yield, fruit numbere1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Hancocke1
Setting
Arlingtone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield, fruit number, and sugar concentration were higher for all genotypes at Arlington than at Hancock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1035 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar concentration was higher at Arlington than Hancock.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis meloe0
Outcome
sugar concentratione1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
Hancocke1
Setting
Arlingtone1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield, fruit number, and sugar concentration were higher for all genotypes at Arlington than at Hancock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1035 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype significantly affected every examined trait.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis meloe0
Material
genotypee1
Outcome
all traits examinede1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“The main effect of genotype was significant for all traits examined.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1104 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BN1 and V exceeded BN2 in fruit weight, yield per plant and yield per hectare.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis meloe0
Material
BN1 and Ve1
Outcome
mean fruit weight, yield per plant and per hectaree1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
BN2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Genotypes BN1 and V had higher mean fruit weight, yield per plant and per hectare, and fruit quality (fruit sugar concentration) than did BN2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1247 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BN1 and V exceeded BN2 in fruit sugar concentration.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis meloe0
Material
BN1 and Ve1
Outcome
fruit sugar concentratione1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
BN2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Genotypes BN1 and V had higher mean fruit weight, yield per plant and per hectare, and fruit quality (fruit sugar concentration) than did BN2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1105–1247 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing affected all traits except branch number and fruit sugar concentration.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
Spacinge1
Outcome
all traitse1
Qualifier
except primary branch number and fruit sugar concentratione1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spacing affected all traits, except primary branch number and fruit sugar concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1336 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing increased fruit number and yield per plant and average fruit weight.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
wider spacinge1
Outcome
Fruit number and yield per plant and average fruit weighte1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruit number and yield per plant and average fruit weight were higher with wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1425 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider spacing lowered yield and fruit number per hectare.

Taxon
MuskmelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
wider spacinge2
Outcome
yield (t·ha -1 ) and fruit number per hectaree1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Muskmelon ( Cucumis melo L.) genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“but yield (t·ha -1 ) and fruit number per hectare were lower.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1427–1488 · show in text ↑
e2

“wider spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1425 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.